You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Baden

Comments

Did that masseuse put ketchup on their backs? Buena esa! I'm sold, sir. Saddling my horse and riding to Spain!
October 14, 2024 at 06:32
You're getting at a human-centric bias? If so, sounds plausible, but can you develop a more specific example?
October 14, 2024 at 06:20
Yes, they can. You've just misunderstood "ultimate" as applied to causation. "In most situations, an ultimate cause may itself be a proximate cause in...
October 14, 2024 at 06:09
"Ultimate" has a different meaning when applied to causation. It doesn't imply "final". Ultimate causes are nested. It's explained in the wiki article...
October 14, 2024 at 06:07
They range from supplies of 1 to (theoretical) supplies of infinity.
October 14, 2024 at 05:59
OK, but you've gone from what seemed like a specific issue in the OP, to some very general comments that only seem incidentally related to it. Are we ...
October 14, 2024 at 05:53
I have been lied to. This is not the Azores, it is Atlantis. Cum Cruise has a lot to answer for.
October 14, 2024 at 03:16
* Ahem* Well... From a bog in Kerry, I ventured abroad, In gay Paris, consumed I a frog, A London alley found me drunk, In a Roman piazza, I made me a...
October 13, 2024 at 15:51
Hello my learned friends and welcome to today's quote from Finnegan's Wake: "bababadalgharaghtakamminarronnkonnbronntonnerronntuonnthunntrovarrhounawn...
October 13, 2024 at 14:22
(If) he actually went to Ireland, thank ye gods I wasn't there.
October 13, 2024 at 13:29
Mm, tricky one. Any idea, @"Shawn"?
October 13, 2024 at 12:37
Nomological dualism, eh? (Wendy vs McWendy). Nice try at one-upmanship, but I'm going to press you on Lucky Chalmers. )£&$(£&)&£@$*£)@$)£$*)£ Fart &£$...
October 13, 2024 at 12:28
So, your critique of David Chalmer's panpsychism is that he doesn't go far enough? Justification, please? *£&£&)@£*)£_£*$*)$@ Superior grin $(@&$($*)!...
October 13, 2024 at 12:24
Human language is tied up with embodiment, sensation, and sentience. These are prerequisites not effects. The very structure of language: ideational, ...
October 13, 2024 at 12:13
And your position on Lucky Charms is... ? *I'm waiting smile* (I use asterisks. So, it's different.)
October 13, 2024 at 12:00
Triggering cause (push of other domino or finger) vs. enabling condition (gravity), bruv. Anyhow, I said "fuzzy" below so I'm insured against all obje...
October 13, 2024 at 11:56
Yes. You focus on outcome. Wayfarer focuses on process. Both perspectives are legitimate to some degree.
October 13, 2024 at 11:38
Basicaly agree; I don't yet know what the issue is, but with some refinement we may get there.
October 13, 2024 at 11:31
Still not 100% clear on what you're getting at. Maybe we can take a simple scenario like the one below, and analyze things from there. * Two dominos, ...
October 13, 2024 at 11:30
E. g. What about: ''We need language to think, therefore we need language to make any inference about language, that's the problem. '' Except it's not...
October 13, 2024 at 08:03
Lucky charms are an underrated foodstuff. The magic lies in the leprechaun. Eating almost anything while contemplating this happy fellow humming catch...
October 13, 2024 at 07:30
Got it because doughnuts were central, indicating materialism, and your doughnut combo was a mess, narrowing it down to Metzinger (mess/ Metz). Anyhow...
October 13, 2024 at 07:08
:strong:
October 13, 2024 at 06:48
You haven't explained why this creates a logical impossibility. The limitations of the child in the lego example don't seem to amount to a logical imp...
October 13, 2024 at 06:43
Right, so neurotechnological phenomenalism a la Thomas Metzinger then?
October 13, 2024 at 06:23
It may be you that can accept ketchup into your life, but the evidence against doughnuts seems quite overwhelming to me.
October 13, 2024 at 05:36
Right so, change of poem then. Drunken Doughnut Danny Doughnut is my name Denying minds is my game Wrote myself a book or two They don't make sense, b...
October 12, 2024 at 18:05
GOOD MORNING @"fdrake" GO BACK TO YOUR METAL BASKET! ...No, it's not working... :death:
October 12, 2024 at 17:28
Yeah, yeah, pass the sauce.
October 12, 2024 at 17:24
I wish I'd written that. Now, I wanna insult @"fdrake" too.
October 12, 2024 at 17:23
I don't know who'll win. The polls could change. Trump might do or say something disastrous. But the chances of 538 being off by that margin by pollin...
October 12, 2024 at 17:17
So, I'm wrong again, eh? :sad:
October 12, 2024 at 17:13
Honestly, I respect you being able to live with that. I require comfort and hope.
October 12, 2024 at 17:12
I'm not doing anything other than calling you out for making a ridiculous unsupported prediction. And putting my pacifier where my mouth is. :wink:
October 12, 2024 at 17:11
Brilliant. :love: :clap:
October 12, 2024 at 17:06
The trick I use with ketchup when I'm stuck is to change the name, then it tastes better. You need some imagination and effort though. I make a label ...
October 12, 2024 at 17:04
I'm just sayin' I'll do that if you're right about the national polls; what'll you do if I'm right that you're completely wrong?
October 12, 2024 at 16:38
That is called wishful thinking, not analysis. If you bet money on it, you'll lose big. But let's take a different tack. If 538 overestimates Trump by...
October 12, 2024 at 16:22
Maybe: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proximate_and_ultimate_causation
October 12, 2024 at 15:57
It doesn't imply that. For Chalmers, who came up with the hard problem, consciousness is not an object but a property of objects (and distinct from ph...
October 12, 2024 at 15:52
Anyhow getting back to food. The thing about ketchup is it doesn't fundamentally alter the nature of the underlying food, though it does give it a mor...
October 12, 2024 at 15:03
Yes, let's not mention it was @"fishfry". Shhhh :zip:
October 12, 2024 at 14:59
I deleted it. You're not the only person who's ever been insulted here. It's not such a big deal.
October 12, 2024 at 14:57
That would be my analysis too. Very close but Kamala seems to be blowing it.
October 12, 2024 at 14:06
You're right. It's off-topic here.
October 12, 2024 at 14:01
Ketchup and Beer Bernie Ketchup is my name I started out seeking fame Dance couldn’t I, nor act nor sing So philosophy became my thing I saw a boson j...
October 12, 2024 at 06:59
But yes, I don't believe we ever get to big T "Truth". Some sort of linguistic stability though, yes. It's more a negative type of progress of substra...
October 12, 2024 at 06:14
I'll take a further look. My position is a philosophical one.
October 12, 2024 at 06:03
His critique of materialism isn't hard to agree with. Materialism does posit, ultimately, mathematical abstractions at the bottom of everything and ig...
October 12, 2024 at 05:49
:grin:
October 11, 2024 at 16:51