-I agree with that statement...this is why we are discussing it. -"Why make the choice to privilege wellbeing? Let's look again at your examples. kill...
A moral system do not offer predictions. It offers evaluations based on contemporary knowledge on the implications specific acts have on well being. -...
-Those are steps of the Philosophical method, and all major branches of Philosophy are included! Aristotle presupposed Logic as a tool necessary to do...
take any act that you could accept as moral. From helping small kids cross the street to killing a terrorist before blowing up a school. You will find...
-so this statement raises on important question....what went wrong with you?lol It might be. I can recall people struggling with such concepts. The im...
No tools thus mathetmatics aren't metaphysical. Metaphysical views on ideas produced by mathematics (like abstract mathematical objects) ....are metap...
You do not look like you are here to question assumptions. You just declare them assumptions when they are descriptions. All I ask is for you is to ch...
questioned??? with hot air? This is not philosophy. This is pseudo philosophy. I am the one putting my framework to the test...but you just tap dance ...
you didn't bother to answer any of my questions when you were the one who objected to my claims....and now you demand an answer to an irrelevant quest...
You are posting an abstract that is irrelevant to a specific method I am describing. Whether we ought to follow the outcome of the system in question ...
NO sir! The difference is that Newton's idea is still established KNOWLEDGE with technical applications while in philosophy you will find pseudo philo...
This is a really cheap excuse sir. The goal of ethics is to define these oughts! So you confuse subjective unfounded declarations with objective moral...
What I mean , do you see a "god" in my system?..And don't be confused, Moral pronouncements are NOT the same with moral evaluations based on Objective...
Again....chronicling is NOT philosophy. That is one of the ten problems in modern Philosophy identified by Bunge in his book "Philosophy in crisis". N...
This makes me really happy to hear. Most individuals in here stick to their guns even when facts hit them in the face with a big metal sign with bold ...
Sure....but looking the holes will never allow ''you" to see what we know. His actual statement was that: ...when he can easily visit a neuroscience d...
maybe you are right and I can see cases where chronicling is not only helpful but also insightful. But in this case we are all posting opinions on a t...
Did you check the data base I sent you? You will keep denying facts? Let me provide the definition of Pseudo philosophy. "What is pseudo-philosophy? P...
Chronicling is NOT Philosophy. Kant or any other great philosopher of the past didn't have access to the epistemology available to us today....so its ...
No it isn't a logical error...ITS just irrelevant to the subject in question. The mistake is to assume jumps.....when I describe the tools I use and y...
-No I don't really have to assume anything. I only observe the objective facts provide by our epistemology and I use the Null Hypothesis to identify t...
Forget that part...we are NOT THERE YET! Whether we MUST follow an objective moral judgments is irrelevant. Pls Focus on my question and try to weight...
Life is the emergence of specific biological process. Meaning is a quality that emerges in specific biological functions (brain functions). Organisms ...
-"A morality that does not tell us what to do is not a morality." -lol what are you talking about???? Morality is an abstract concept...it tell us not...
-I never told you what you ought to do. I am pointing out a common characteristic in all moral evaluations. Acts that are accepted as moral appear to ...
Such a perspective is Unnecessary and Insufficient plus we have zero epistemic foundations to make that assumption rendering it a pseudo philosophical...
I am not sure you understand the premises made by Secular Morality. You view morality as being about " what one ought to do". So you assume that my po...
First of all you seem to ignore the definition of scientism. I am the first to reject the basic premises of Scientistm (1.Science is the only source o...
You wont find an "ought" in my statements. I never claims what we "ought to do". I only pointed out that what we understand as a morality refers to th...
btw we don't "ought" to behave in a specific way!(promote our well being). We descent from individuals who for thousands of years survived through org...
Its a Pragmatic Necessity, no a fallacy. There is a huge difference there. -"Why ought we promote the wellbeing of society?" - Societies that do well ...
- I am not here to promote my moral framework as flawless or absolutely true. I do appreciate your reasonable doubts and questions and I am far from s...
Well Pleasure doesn't equate to Happiness and Happiness is an essential metric for our well being. The Denial of a Pleasurable moment or activity is n...
Comments