Nickolasgaspar

If you like laughing....just read your claims!:wink:

Not really....one front fork ,some tubes a shorter stem and a rear derailleur

-I appreciate your input. The real problem is not individuals like Hillary, but guys like Relativist who are almost there but they will spill the milk...

Your usage appears to be non-standard in the realm of philosophy. No that is a false statement. Any usage that doesn't much the one I suggest and rese...

Listen,the Freddie chip replaced most on board logic enabling the production of cheaper boards. Also all daughter boards where remove in the previous ...

-"Yes. But Im not trying to convince you." -Hillary ...first be honest to your self and then to others. You act like a child. You are all over the pla...

Am I going to do this with you too? Really. After many months I got back in this forum and I had people denying the role of wisdom in philosophy, the ...

You were not...since you said :"'ll defend Hillary (a bit). He is free to hold irrational beliefs" No were in my statement I limited his freedom to ac...

No No No....don't introduce ifs in the topic of this discussion. The example is specific. Non acceptance(rejection) includes Ps that we are not convin...

-Correct to a degree. We as thinkers also have the freedom to learn about those claims and find out from those who presented them in public forums whe...

Argument from Ambiguity fallacy. You are talking about the steps of a verification process(after the validation of a principle) while I refer on the m...

I don't learn the truth in my dreams by gods! Floberhulfter comes and informs me on what is true or not.

As you said its your attitude......not other people's attitude or the Default Position one should hold for p. If you project your attitude on others t...

There aren't scientific bases for gods and you haven't presented any. They first have to be demonstrated as true before one claims they provide a reas...

DUde Hillary....this is what I am saying you from post one mate!!!! You need to demonstrate the objective and epistemic values of your reasons when tr...

I am getting really tired with accusations about things that I didn't do...by Universewoowoo, Hillary and you now. WHEN DID I say that he is not free ...

-Ok I saw in my sleep that your claims about god are all wrong. its not a scientific claim, it doesn't need evidence and that proves that you are wron...

That is a problem because "I believe ~p" is NOT a direct logical negation of the proposition P! I reject p only points to one thing......that I..........

Grow up Mr Hillary! You are the magical thinker who talks about gods. you are the one who needs to provide evidence. I don't promote any claims. I onl...

-"Anyone" doesn't have some abstract "burden of proof''. Only claims have burden of proof. Those you accept them and promote them are oblige to meet i...

that's your problem Mr Hillary, not mine. To be precise its an intrinsic problem of unfalsifiable claims based on non naturalistic principles. Fortuna...

Actually we are talking about logical negation and their importance to be direct. A Direct logical negation allow us to avoid addressing other irrelev...

Oh!ok , I had the wrong impression they were gods...lol

Keep talking to your self...this is what you do after all. You are done....is this difficult for you to understand?

again lets assume that the caliber of this arrogant pretentious demagogue is above me....HOW would you know??? lol Because he trolls you and your soci...

-" -lol so why accepting it? Aren't you interested in avoiding potentially wrong claims? You don't really care the truth value of what you believe? -"...

lol....that must be a new low for you...but then again moving your finger to others while falsify accusing them of things just to hear your voice is r...

That is a false equivalence . The existence of a material universe CAN ONLY BE USED AS EVIDENCE for the existence of a MATERIAL UNIVERSE. The qualifie...

I said I am not sure....not that I am interested in knowing. -My Default Position is different from yours. lol....hahahahaha obviously, but your is ju...

-And how would you know mr Hillary??? You are unable to understand how we define a Default Position or why all claims come with a burden. Do you reall...

To be honest I am not sure about your ontology....but I am not a computer.

Hillary....learn how to tell when a post is for you. These comments are not for you mate.... I am addressing an arrogant sophist who make ups accusati...

I exposed your patronizing urges and your bovine manure on a discussion you never read.... and I said 'YOU ARE DONE". Do you have unknown words in tha...

No , you need empirical verification to identify the correct criteria and principles. Imagination and fantasy can only help us to come up with out of ...

Obvious books do not fit where your head is located... or you don't have enough light up there, try ebooks.lol When you ever decide to address the act...

-"Manipulate"!!! ? lol so according to your reasoning Pointing out the weakness in people's reasoning by replacing their flawed assumptions with an ob...

lol mr Hillary. You can not conclude to a point that isn't part of your premises!!! And even if you did constructed a valid argument, you forget that ...

-An example that is designed to "shock", provokes thinking and expose the gaps in an argument has nothing to do with the value of "right/wrong" or "ro...

-Correct because we don't have a way to investigate an Absolute statement like "Whatever begins to exist has a cause". We can only answer that within ...

-Hillary...you are really bad in reasoning. Its not for you to decide whether your claim comes with a burden. EVery claim has a burden, whether you wa...

-You are unable to stick to the topic mr Hillary! I am just pointing out that your conclusions are objectively irrational. This is called "critique" a...

No , unfortunately you don't. Knowledge is by definition objective so you should be able by now to point to Good evidence for your belief. YOu can onl...

Thank you Tom. Acceptance and Rejection inform people of my position towards a claim. For them to know the reason they will need to ask an additional ...

No I only point out that you are an irrational individual for accepting god claims that you can not Objectively demonstrate to be true. I never accept...

You shouldn't and you need to understand that when we don't accept a claim from becoming our belief, our dictionaries provide the opposite of that act...

First of all your bank account can not be as much a proof that you are no billionaire, as that gods exist. You will need objective evidence either tha...

I know...its part of the problem.

So you don't understand why we should address a single claim...not its opposite? You c You can either reject a claim either because you are not convin...

So you also don't understand why I don't accept/reject A doesn't ? I think A is wrong????

-No it isn't. Don't focus on why we demand to demonstrate guiltiness beyond reasonable doubt (its for obvious reasons....the freedom and life of the d...