You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Mike Adams

['Member']Joined: August 21, 2017 at 17:35Last active: December 25, 2017 at 19:231 discussions33 comments

Discussions (1)

Comments

Not necessarily. Proof of an indeterministic universe in which we may be able to exert some agent control is always useful...
October 01, 2017 at 21:36
It could be argued that it's is our humansize-skewed scale perspective that makes the notion seem outlandish, where as in reality (given what we know ...
September 07, 2017 at 15:28
This guy is saying the pilot wave theory is deterministic...
September 07, 2017 at 15:23
I should really point out that I don't necessarily believe in determinism, I am just yet to hear an acceptable scientific explanation of how we can ac...
September 07, 2017 at 12:53
The refusal to countenance this as a real possibility just demonstrates the problems human beings have with scale. Due to our arrogance as perceived '...
September 07, 2017 at 08:31
MW theory has been taken seriously by many scientists for decades... (Plus your apparent hatred for determinists is bordering on the hysterical.)
September 07, 2017 at 08:18
Also - apokrisis, could you please expand on what you mean by 'epistemic cut.' Thanks
September 06, 2017 at 19:50
Great thread this. In response to previous assertions that the reality of multiple universe is 'craziness' is it any more crazy than any of the other ...
September 06, 2017 at 17:18
I count myself as a liberal, and any sensible liberal should realise that Trump is a direct result of elitist liberal arrogance (as is Brexit). The do...
September 06, 2017 at 08:22
I'm afraid we'all have to agree to disagree that what you have offered here is a suitably detailed explanation of how such a mental process could occu...
August 30, 2017 at 18:37
And, just so you know, my current line of arguments are in no way 'faith' based, but rather grounded in science and logic. I'm happy to be proved othe...
August 30, 2017 at 18:35
Please could you then offer an alternative explanation for how a current action can be driven by past influences without leading to an infinite regres...
August 30, 2017 at 18:26
So if we're right, then, at T, X is not truly free to chose either course of action - leading us back to a form of determinism (albeit of the psycholo...
August 30, 2017 at 16:30
I certainly didn't mean to sound nasty, and if I did I apologize. What I'm trying to ascertain is how, on your view, the fundamental mind interacts wi...
August 30, 2017 at 02:59
For a non-dualist you do seem to quite clearly separate mind from the physical..
August 30, 2017 at 02:55
"Yep, mind it's fundamental. Once that is understood, life makes sense again." I'll ask once again - of what substance is the 'fundamental mind' made ...
August 30, 2017 at 02:49
That description is not really of sufficient detail to be a great deal of use. Are you saying it can in now way be reduced to a physical substrate in ...
August 30, 2017 at 01:23
"X's mind decides for some reason. It is the mind that is deciding for its own reasons." All that explanation does is raises far more questions. Among...
August 30, 2017 at 00:45
Steve's right here, and this is the biggest problem in debates on consciousness. Until the scientific/philosophical community can agree on some form o...
August 30, 2017 at 00:15
This is all very interesting and informative but none of it really addresses the question of precisely 'how' an autonomous being can exercise their au...
August 29, 2017 at 23:54
Nothing there answers the question. "The mind is exactly what everyone experiences." - which is what? "t is what is creatingthe impetus to move in a d...
August 27, 2017 at 13:45
Oops - I meant to quote the whole last post..
August 27, 2017 at 08:10
Okay Rich - so you agree the mind/brain is comprised of the same physical substance as everything else and part of the same structure. So I come back ...
August 27, 2017 at 08:10
So you're a dualist?
August 26, 2017 at 13:54
And how (scientifically speaking) does the 'creative mind' - which is presumably a physical entity - generate atomic motion without any form of preced...
August 26, 2017 at 13:45
I'm interested - how do you define your view on the free will debate? Some kind of libertarianist? You say choices are "probabilistic with the possibi...
August 25, 2017 at 18:21
Interested to see how you would account for 'free choice' within a universe that (seemingly) adheres to a directional flow of time without committing ...
August 25, 2017 at 12:14
"My fate has been sealed since the Genesis of the Big Bang." So you're for Determinism now?
August 25, 2017 at 07:54
Which objection? Apologies, but your post seemed a bit vague and I'm not sure which objection you're answering. With regard to the quote you use thoug...
August 21, 2017 at 21:54
The religious and scientific conceptions of determinism are actually very similar - one ordained by an infinite being, the other by a closed, causal u...
August 21, 2017 at 20:42
There is nothing necessarily supernatural about phenomenal illusions. They happen all the time - just ask the amputee who still 'feels' the missing le...
August 21, 2017 at 19:21
'Experiencing' choice does not necessarily entail true choice in the metaphysical sense. The human experience is rife with illusion. Determinism quest...
August 21, 2017 at 18:48
I suppose we would have to agree on a definition of 'caused' here. But ultimately in cases such as atomic decay, exactly when an electron for example ...
August 21, 2017 at 17:49
Determinism is based on Newtonian mechanics, which is now superseded by quantum physics. In quantum physics 'uncaused' events are common place. The qu...
August 21, 2017 at 17:39