Nzomigni

Yes, the discipline itself cannot be dogmatic, but who represents it theorically can

We could define self-awareness as the ability to pass the turing-test and this is theorically possible from our possible research on machine learning....

And this would be more of eliminitavism about consciousness than a attempt to reduce it to the physical.

Lets give up the information-processing term. They're physical and only physical.

Human doesn't have innate knowledge about themselves or the external world as much as a computer(or any physical system) have innate knowledge about a...

I'm an eliminitavist about consciousness. I think human brains conception of what exist or not is skewed and asserts that consciousness exist when the...

My argument is such that : P1) Everything that there is to know about a information-processing system/physical object is how it works. P2) Humans are ...

I don't think you can "solve it". This is only a point of view that i find more coherent. We still need to do research on neuroscience though.

Yes, i did on wikipedia.

Why you assume machines can't have self-awareness ? What do you mean by self-awareness ? I may have a cognitive neuroscience theory that may interest ...

We could replace the computer by any physical system you can imagine. My point is that this system self-awareness would be similar to those of a human...

My physicalism is opposed to view that give a special ontological status to first-person view or view that states that surnatural object exist. My vie...

This is mainly revelant for problem such as consciousness.

Yes, this is a view that only the third point of view of science can say what exist or not.

Ok, i will head there. I would defined physicalism as : A exist if and only if A is a necesary variable of a measurement of the natural science as suc...

We could understand physicalism as a scientific realism such as "our best scientific theory of the world tells us as much as we know about reality". W...

So i suppose you aren't a physicalist, it's understandable. But i just want to indicate that the physicalist position isnt incorehent.

So something exist if it please you ? It fits the common-sense, innate vew point i described earlier. I don't mean that we shouldn't have empathy for ...

Consciouness isnt the variable of anything. This is more ludicrous to say that consciouness exist than say god exist. Atleast the last would have crea...

Afterall it depends on what you mean by exist : If you mean something that fits in a human conception of the world, i agree that consciouness exist. I...

Consciouness doesnt need to exist if we assume naturalism. Science doesn't have to care about consciouness. It's out of its picture by the very nature...

I may have misunderstood pragmaticism myself. The core idea pragmatism is that the object of an idea equates the sensible effects that the object migh...

Yes, this is very easy. Don't think in english.