You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Jamal

Comments

I don't think the quotation explains his reluctance to support political activism, I don't think it affirms that he was an ontological antirealist, an...
April 29, 2025 at 03:01
I don't know what to say about all that MU. Your notion of concepts and objects seems incommensurable with mine, such that we're talking past each oth...
April 29, 2025 at 02:39
Looks good. So making it analytic basically involves saying the same thing but without the rhetorical flourishes and excessive Latinate verbiage? :win...
April 28, 2025 at 09:49
So that leads me to frame Adorno's project in the following way. Real things don't quite fit our mental categories, but we cannot just deal with this ...
April 28, 2025 at 05:11
Yes, I just took a first stab at making it apparent. But if you're looking for a refutation of idealism in Adorno you might be disappointed. But consi...
April 28, 2025 at 04:39
:up: But I'm giving Adorno the benefit of the doubt at this stage.
April 28, 2025 at 00:31
It's brilliant, but I definitely wouldn't call it an introduction. It traces Adorno's thinking through his interactions with Walter Benjamin, Lukacs, ...
April 28, 2025 at 00:07
I did the version at anesi.com: Apparently when it gets above 4.5 is when you begin to give off authoritarian vibes, above 5.5 and you’re pretty much ...
April 27, 2025 at 17:23
In my opinion, which I believe I share with Adorno, when we talk about society we are not talking about a concept, therefore “society” doesn’t refer t...
April 27, 2025 at 15:58
Yes and no.
April 27, 2025 at 07:08
Well, he does immediately give the prime example he has in mind of what "the object" is: antagonistic society. And despite our worries about formal lo...
April 27, 2025 at 05:56
We're reading the lectures at the moment, haven't got to ND itself. In lecture 1: In the notes for the lecture it's laid out like this: On the face of...
April 26, 2025 at 15:48
Even them, I think. I don’t know off the top of my head.
April 26, 2025 at 15:11
:up: :strong:
April 26, 2025 at 14:43
Thank you, I’m glad to hear it. I just hope I can maintain the energy.
April 26, 2025 at 14:40
I suppose you’re right. But then, Adorno was pretty much saying that every philosopher had imposed their concepts extinguishingly on the world.
April 26, 2025 at 14:29
Yes indeed. The issue for me has always been to decide whether, when Adorno and Zizek and Marx come out with their arresting paradoxes, it’s just the ...
April 26, 2025 at 14:24
I think this fits with my understanding. And it’s not a rejection of identity as used by logicians so much as an accusation that predication is tantam...
April 26, 2025 at 12:23
Yes, but note that Adorno thinks the role of philosophy is to make that intellectual effort after all, only without extinguishing the complexity, diff...
April 26, 2025 at 04:54
Nicely put!
April 26, 2025 at 04:34
This will be a crazy simplification, but I always find within myself an impatient desire to deal with this topic once and for all, as if I have a sens...
April 26, 2025 at 04:23
LND, Lecture 1 (continued) I hope nobody minds these mini-essays; they help me to get to grips with the reading, and I hope to respond to others later...
April 26, 2025 at 03:52
That might be a big topic! I might say something about it tomorrow.
April 25, 2025 at 18:35
I see what you mean, good point :up: I’m just going to have to remember to compare translations or check the original when we get stuck.
April 25, 2025 at 17:14
No, and please, no more of these frankisms (random questions with mysterious hidden motivations).
April 25, 2025 at 17:03
I’m still a bit confused about that too. I think it’s because he kind of rushes through it impatiently. But maybe we are just getting hung up on somet...
April 25, 2025 at 17:01
Yes, and some would accuse Adorno of misinterpreting Hegel at this juncture. Yes, point taken, but we’re talking about lecture 1, where he makes out l...
April 25, 2025 at 16:49
But contradictions are absolutely central, and he emphasizes that he doesn’t just mean discrepancies (nor, we can assume, does he just mean tensions, ...
April 25, 2025 at 16:38
Yeah it’s interestingly odd that he openly states that a motif — maybe we can say a theme — of his philosophy is working out why he hates synthesis so...
April 25, 2025 at 16:22
Your interpretations look good to me MU. That's quite interesting. I forgot to go back to Plato when I was describing dialectics. When I last read the...
April 25, 2025 at 08:27
Thank you for your contribution, Number. I'm not sure how to answer until I know more, and I'm not familiar with Žižek's critique. My suspicion is tha...
April 25, 2025 at 08:07
I baked it already! https://i.postimg.cc/7Z5pkLfp/smallcake.jpg
April 25, 2025 at 06:45
Actually, when applied to the baking of cakes, the subjunctive indicates it won't happen since you are too lazy to do it. Happy birthday young, but ol...
April 25, 2025 at 05:28
That’s suitably dialectical, and agreeable.
April 24, 2025 at 09:14
I think I see what you mean. Adorno doesn’t like idealism because it’s too arrogant, presuming an identity between subject and object, not because he ...
April 24, 2025 at 08:53
I'd be interested to see others' thoughts on the objection that Adorno attempts to respond to: Why must everything be a matter of contradictions? In m...
April 24, 2025 at 05:11
I think I concur with your gist, but... Marx, Adorno, Zizek, Malabou, Pippin and Brandom seem to have been able to go through that "oh shit!" moment w...
April 24, 2025 at 03:57
We start with the Lectures on Negative Dialectics (LND), which is based on recordings of Adorno's lectures in 1965-66, just after he'd completed the s...
April 23, 2025 at 08:29
Tim means the members of TPF, The Philosophy Forum, and has for reasons known only to himself chosen to be difficult and weird. Don’t take it personal...
April 22, 2025 at 16:52
Starting there is ok with me. BTW I haven't studied Hegel, and some might think it's mad to tackle this without doing Hegel first, but I'm not massive...
April 18, 2025 at 21:36
Useful as preparation — or we could even start with it — is Lectures on Negative Dialectics: Fragments of a Lecture Course 1965/1966. His lectures are...
April 18, 2025 at 21:02
Minima Moralia is too aphoristic for a reading group, IMO
April 18, 2025 at 20:53
Yeah I will/would start a thread. I'm thinking Negative Dialectics, specifically the non-official but apparently only decent English translation by De...
April 18, 2025 at 20:52
I'm up for it and I'm in the mood.
April 18, 2025 at 20:45
To me, it had something real from the first moment I saw it. So yeah, I think you've been irrevocably tainted by your exposure to AI. There's no going...
April 18, 2025 at 20:43
I'd be up for a TPF reading group. But I reckon nobody else would be interested.
April 18, 2025 at 20:40
:pray:
April 18, 2025 at 20:07
Yeah, me too, and that's pretty much what his Negative Dialectics is about so that's what I'm aiming for at the moment.
April 18, 2025 at 20:02
https://i.postimg.cc/XYyL2HxF/leg-in-the-air-parthenon-by-edgard-alsteens-used-on-a-v0-w1xwyk8ejav91.jpg A great photograph of the Parthenon, possibly...
April 18, 2025 at 19:54
Thanks; I'm glad I'm not crazy. But again I want to say that it's not conservatism: Adorno castigates capitalism at every opportunity. So it's somethi...
April 18, 2025 at 19:07