You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Humanism gives way to misanthropy

Banno November 05, 2020 at 01:14 5400 views 17 comments
Humanism is the hope that we can work with each other.

Misanthropy, the desperate realisation that all we have to work with is each other.

Philosophical Misanthropy

The Enemy and the Fugitive are too desperate. So one finds oneself vacillating between the Activist and the Quietist.

Comments (17)

Banno November 05, 2020 at 07:39 #468691
Go back a step, then: Misanthropy is the moral condemnation of humanity.

Not the hatred of humanity, but the recognition of their moral culpability. The cited article seeks to "recognise the moral awfulness of humanity without drifting into hatred, violence, or despair".

...the real philosophical task isn’t about living out a single misanthropic stance; it’s about dealing with the emotionally and morally difficult oscillation between stances. Coping with this is the heart of the misanthropic predicament.





Possibility November 05, 2020 at 14:31 #468776
Reply to Banno Thanks for the article. I think it helps to recognise the broader potential of humanity: both the tendency towards ignorance, isolation and exclusion, as well as our capacity for awareness, connection and collaboration. I think this is partly why I, too, find myself vacillating between the Activist and the Quietist. It’s hope, I guess: a quiet confidence that genuine and stable leaps forward have occurred as a minority movement - a barely noticeable yet progressive creep, not a bloody revolution.
Banno November 05, 2020 at 19:37 #468842
Reply to Possibility Cheers. I'd read the article a month ago, and was intending to post something, but bypassed it in a bunch of other threads. Recent events brought me back to it.

Quoting Banno
The take-home is that half of eligible voters wanted to put their trust in a liar.


The tick is to be exasperated, but not to despair. Things improve, in small steps. Perhaps.
Gnomon November 06, 2020 at 00:30 #468947
Quoting Banno
Misanthropy, the desperate realisation that all we have to work with is each other.

"Hell is other people" ___Sartre
Aryamoy Mitra November 06, 2020 at 05:46 #469002
Reply to Gnomon
"Hell is other people" ___Sartre
You'd hypothesize that one of most history's most revered Existentialists would confer a greater value onto the material subject of his philosophy.
Ansiktsburk November 06, 2020 at 06:26 #469009
In the TS Humanism is given an explanation. Thats pretty bold IMHO. What humanism is, is up for the grabs even more than misantropy. Some fluffy benelovent feelings toward people in general. The wealthy left do have kind of kidnapped the term for the moment, but "work together" does not seem to cover that contemporary version. Or any version I have heard about.

But common for the two, Humanism and Misantropy seems both to want to construe a simplified, holistic view of the world, to escape from the messiness world have.
180 Proof November 06, 2020 at 06:51 #469013
Quoting Banno
The [tr]ick is to be exasperated, but not to despair. Things improve, in small steps. Perhaps.

I'm reminded of
[quote=Antonio Gramsci]The challenge of modernity is to live without illusions and without becoming disillusioned.[/quote]

My own 'misanthropy' is absurdist, rather than existential, in the similiar vein of a posthuman (posthumous?) conjecture à la
[quote=Freddy Zarathustra]Man is a rope [ ... ] he is a bridge and not an end.[/quote]
such that 'all we have is each other' to bring about a succcessor species or, more likely, prematurely our own extinction.
Gnomon November 06, 2020 at 18:33 #469197
Quoting Aryamoy Mitra
"Hell is other people" ___Sartre
You'd hypothesize that one of most history's most revered Existentialists would confer a greater value onto the material subject of his philosophy.

Uh, no. I have no hypothesis. Just a tongue-in-cheek quote. :joke:
Aryamoy Mitra November 06, 2020 at 19:46 #469217
Reply to Gnomon
I entirely concur. I was merely conveying that given the character of the quote, one would hypothesize the above. 'You' was used interchangeably; I wasn't referring specifically to your quotation, but was rather inferring a conclusion from it.
frank November 06, 2020 at 20:38 #469227
Quoting Banno
The cited article seeks to "recognise the moral awfulness of humanity without drifting into hatred, violence, or despair".


There are only two ways to do that: acceptance or delusion.
Judaka November 06, 2020 at 21:49 #469247
Humanity shouldn't be judged as people are too different from each other. Really, any attempt to judge humanity will show the interests and interpretations of the intellect above anything else. Humans in the aggregate can be judged with sweeping generalisations but any one human is too complex for anyone to fully understand. Misanthropy may be emotionally satisfying but it's intellectually shallow and pointless.
Banno November 06, 2020 at 22:19 #469262
Quoting Judaka
Humanity shouldn't be judged...

And yet you so judge.
Banno November 06, 2020 at 22:19 #469263
Reply to Gnomon SO is heaven.
Banno November 06, 2020 at 22:22 #469264
Reply to frank Delusions have their place.
Gnomon November 06, 2020 at 22:28 #469268
Quoting Banno
?Gnomon
SO is heaven.


So Heaven also needs Humanism? :smile:
Judaka November 06, 2020 at 22:45 #469273
Reply to Banno
The classic banno response.
frank November 06, 2020 at 23:07 #469287
Quoting Banno
Delusions have their place.


Cant get through the day without one or two.