What’s in a name?
I’m a newbie to this forum, and I am intrigued by the names people choose. An interesting aspect of this forum is that each argument has to stand by itself because, at least initially, one has no idea of the reputation of the person making the argument. In normal discourse, a step in an argument would have a value that is a function of the argument itself and the reputation of the person saying it.
Anyway, I digress - I chose a name coming into the forum that represents me - it is my name, and I’m not trying to project anything other than who I really am. But some of the other user names are obviously chosen to project some persona or imply a reputation.
I wonder what the motivations are for choosing these names...
Anyway, I digress - I chose a name coming into the forum that represents me - it is my name, and I’m not trying to project anything other than who I really am. But some of the other user names are obviously chosen to project some persona or imply a reputation.
I wonder what the motivations are for choosing these names...
Comments (12)
Then there are those that seem to choose a name associated with some desired attribute, or a philosopher that they perhaps aspire to emulate. Perhaps they are uncomfortable in being themselves, and wish to borrow the mana of another.
Me, I know I know nothing, and therefore my only direction is to decrease my ignorance. I assume my ideas are probably wrong, and I wish to be criticised, for only through such critique, can I find where the value of my ideas sits in the world of ideas. Only I can be me.
I is just a phrase I have to repeat often in my job.
Noble Dust is an album I made about 10 years ago; it's a phrase that to me at the time represented the dichotomy of mortality (Dust) vs. the inherent value of human life (Noble). Over the years its just become my go-to moniker wherever I happen to land on the internet; I don't think about it much when I use it.
Ditto, although I use a simple contraction I like. My moniker was well known on a popular climbing forum before it vanished. My feeling is that we all reveal who we are, or provide easy clues one might follow to find out. Why hide behind an obscure avatar?
So the particular "moniker" 180 Proof came about off the cuff and tongue-in-chief connoting both 'almost pure' alcohol (90% - very combustible!) and 'reversible' (absurd I suppose), which more and more suited my online critical-dialectical 'career' as a self-appointed pro bono "cult deprogramner" (contra bible/quran/WOO-thumping) ...
[quote=Benny Spinoza]I do not know how to teach philosophy without becoming a disturber of established religion.[/quote]
... and "philosophical rodeo clown" (contra trollish bullshit & charlatanry/sophistry). I haven't ever given this 'persona' as such much thought; but there it is, my ironizing masquerade.
No doubt, the personal being philosophical, 'the real me' is also expressed through many thousands of posts and hundreds of intense, non-trivial, discussions / debates. I seem to be among the very few members here and elsewhere who bothers to detail my member profile (i.e. lay (synoptic) autiobiographical-philosophical cards on the table), not at all "hiding" behind either a name or moniker. That's my inner child, my daimon, up there on the top-left looking every one of my interlocutors in the eye with that earnest expression "Let's reason together, muthafuckas!" (Samuel L Jackson voice-over).
:death: :flower:
edit:
https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/460745 :up:
I like the concept behind this. I once started a highly unsuccessful website called humanitycomputer.org, the premise being that the human race should be able to reason itself out of whatever messing it gets itself into. Very idealistic - I was much younger and more naive then.
Made me smile.
Quoting Noble Dust
I often use 'the VRguy' for the same reason - having worked in the VR industry for decades.
I have to say anything else?