Can a "Purpose" exist without consciousness?
So that we are all on the same page, we need to define "purpose" and "consciousness" to answer this question. "Consciousness," is defined herein is that quality that you, the reader, has and that forms your belief that you exist. "Purpose" is defined as a thing which we commonly refer to as a thought or idea that desires or drives action. The question is whether "Purpose" can exist in any other form, other than a thought.
Comments (18)
Yeah, but not if you define purpose as:
Quoting Ash Abadear
But wouldn’t you agree that hammers have purposes? And they certainly aren’t capable of thought...
Nah. Hammers do not have purposes. They are used for our purposes. Having a purpose could be rendered as aiming to do something or other in particualr. Hammers do not aim to do anything.
Yes, as would everything else.
Quoting creativesoul
I guess that’s right. People give things, and sometimes people, purpose according to their needs and intentions.
The liver's purpose is to produce bile but it is absent of phenomenal thought. We still discover functions of our organs to this day. It may also be true that conscious thought has further functions beyond what we know.
I don’t believe the universe has any purpose now, even with the existence of consciousness. At least not in any objective sense of the word. So, no. For me, “purpose” is entirely subjective, as it depends on consciousness.
Thanks for posting this. I just added this to my journal. I suppose the answer is according to you that the two are very closely related as opposed to loosely related.
When a being is capable of experiencing the notion of planning something and seeing it to fruition, a valid purpose or meaning to their life is experienced and thus exists, even if it is only relevant to the being thinking it. For Example, if a Creator created an ant colony to dig through his soil and make it fertile, an individual ant may see its individual purpose as carrying a single grain of sand from point A to point B. If the ant experienced the idea of planning to carry the grain of sand from one spot to another, and then finishes it, is it possible to say the ant was wrong about its purpose? Isn't any plan that comes to fruition a correct interpretation of a purpose of one’s life.
If a Creator created humans with a purpose, I don't think that means that purposes contemplated by individual humans never exist. If a Creator never existed, would the greatness or superiority of one purpose over another be dependent on the intelligence of the being who contemplates it? Who could judge?
"Purpose" is a word created and used by man to demarcate that which he finds to have value, that which is valuable to him. This is not a profound question, the answer is swiftly, and absolutely, no. The question is merely an abstract game one deems to play with themselves and others.
Unconsciousness can give you more purposes than being conscious could ever give you.
Purpose is meaning attributed to existence - including life, being, activity, object, etc. Meaning is a relational property of anything that ‘matters’. Purpose is therefore a property of any meaningful relation. This ‘thought or idea that desires or drives action’ is one process of attributing meaning, of judging purposiveness, but is not the only process by which this occurs.
So, yes - purpose can exist without consciousness - just not in the form of ‘thought’ or ‘idea’, not even as a ‘thing’. Without consciousness, purpose is not even a question - there would be no awareness of any relation without purpose. Either a meaningful interaction occurs, or no relation exists.
The question is more ‘without consciousness, can a life, being, activity or object even lack purpose?’