You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

To the people who assert "there are no gods."

Frank Apisa August 19, 2020 at 15:22 4375 views 17 comments
To the people who assert “there are no gods” or “it is far more likely that there are no gods than that there is at least one”…

…I call, “BULLSHIT.”

You people are doing the same thing as the folks are doing who assert, “There is a GOD” or “It is far more likely that there IS a GOD than that there are none." You are just guessing in the opposite direction.

Both groups are operating from “faith” in a guess about what does or does not exist in the REALITY of existence. Both are "beliefs."

ME?

I have no idea if “no gods exist” or if at least one does. I prefer not to guess on the issue, because all such guesses would be nothing but blind guesses—nothing more than a coin toss.

If I did, however, make such a guess, I would have the ethical wherewithal to call the guess…A GUESS.

Comments (17)

Gregory August 19, 2020 at 15:40 #444618
I know the Thomistic God doesn't exist because since he sustains the world he would also have to sustain child rape in act, which would contradict his holiness. So that's one god down
3017amen August 19, 2020 at 15:42 #444619
Reply to Frank Apisa

Frank!

Wow, this is quite a purging of sorts, eh!? Remember Pascal's Wager? That could be an analogious or a possible thesis to work from there... .

To that end, I would like to start with your definition of Belief? In your view, philosophically, what does it mean to hold or have a Belief (I'm just putting it in caps for emphasis)?

Second, as a Christian Existentialist, my 'belief' is that there is much more supporting evidence from history (the Christian Bible), nature, and existence itself for (to support) the existence of God than not. I can succincty enumerate them if you like...then we can go through each one.

(In fact--as you suggest--I will argue that the Atheist belief system is based more on ignorance than not.)
Frank Apisa August 19, 2020 at 16:07 #444635
Quoting Gregory
Gregory
1.3k
I know the Thomistic God doesn't exist because since he sustains the world he would also have to sustain child rape in act, which would contradict his holiness. So that's one god down


Yeah...if the god has to accept YOUR definition of what is holy and what isn't.
whollyrolling August 19, 2020 at 16:09 #444637
Reply to Frank Apisa Hey man, do you know what 'faith' is?
Hippyhead August 19, 2020 at 16:12 #444639
Quoting Frank Apisa
To the people who assert “there are no gods” or “it is far more likely that there are no gods than that there is at least one”…

…I call, “BULLSHIT.”


I believe I've read this before somewhere, just can't remember where though.....
Frank Apisa August 19, 2020 at 16:14 #444641
Quoting 3017amen
3017amen
2.3k
?Frank Apisa

Frank!


Amen.

Amen:Wow, this is quite a purging of sorts, eh!? Remember Pascal's Wager? That could be an analogious or a possible thesis to work from there... .


The two most worthless philosophical protocols are Pascal's Wager and Occam's Razor. I do not use them.

Amen:To that end, I would like to start with your definition of Belief? In your view, philosophically, what does it mean to hold or have a Belief (I'm just putting it in caps for emphasis)?


In a philosophical discussion (or a religious discussion) the use of "belief" is a way of disguising a guess.

Amen:Second, as a Christian Existentialist, my 'belief' is that there is much more supporting evidence from history (the Christian Bible), nature, and existence itself for (to support) the existence of God than not. I can succincty enumerate them if you like...then we can go through each one.


I am sure the people who "believe" there are no gods or who "believe" it is much more likely that there are no gods than that there is at least one...can also enumerate them.

None hold any water.

But give me your best one if you want and we can discuss it.

Amen:(In fact, I will argue that the Atheist belief system is based more on ignorance than not.)


I suppose you would. Just as I would suppose people who guess the other way would argue that your "beliefs" derive from ignorance.

Frank Apisa August 19, 2020 at 16:16 #444643
Quoting whollyrolling
whollyrolling
454
?Frank Apisa Hey man, do you know what 'faith' is?


Yeah.

In a religious or philosophical context...

...a "belief" is a guess about the unknown.

"Faith" is being pig-headed about insisting the guess is correct.

Frank Apisa August 19, 2020 at 16:17 #444644
Quoting Hippyhead
Hippyhead
228
To the people who assert “there are no gods” or “it is far more likely that there are no gods than that there is at least one”…

…I call, “BULLSHIT.”
— Frank Apisa

I believe I've read this before somewhere, just can't remember where though.....


You "believe" that...or you "know" that? :wink:

whollyrolling August 19, 2020 at 16:18 #444645
Reply to Frank Apisa That's not what the dictionary says though. Plays on words only serve to derail conversation. Redefining a word is only convenient inside your own head or the heads of others who believe the same sleight-of-word trick works.
Judaka August 19, 2020 at 16:19 #444646
Reply to Frank Apisa
What is a god?
whollyrolling August 19, 2020 at 16:23 #444650
Reply to Frank Apisa And if you can't agree on terms, then the entire conversation is pointless and will never go anywhere unless it sidetracks into more interesting things that contain common terms and insightful dialogue.

Repeating the same words without learning or progressing in any way for months isn't philosophy--or maybe it is man, who am I to say I guess.
Frank Apisa August 19, 2020 at 16:52 #444663
Quoting whollyrolling
whollyrolling
460
?Frank Apisa That's not what the dictionary says though. Plays on words only serve to derail conversation. Redefining a word is only convenient inside your own head or the heads of others who believe the same sleight-of-word trick works.



Oh. I thought you were asking me what it is...not what "the dictionary" says it is.


Frank Apisa August 19, 2020 at 16:55 #444664
Quoting Judaka
Judaka
736
?Frank Apisa
What is a god?



An entity that created or caused to be created what we humans now consider “the Universe.”

Frank Apisa August 19, 2020 at 16:56 #444665
Quoting whollyrolling
whollyrolling
460
?Frank Apisa And if you can't agree on terms, then the entire conversation is pointless and will never go anywhere unless it sidetracks into more interesting things that contain common terms and insightful dialogue.

Repeating the same words without learning or progressing in any way for months isn't philosophy--or maybe it is man, who am I to say I guess.


Okay. Maybe you want to find a thread that more suits your needs and wants.

Echarmion August 19, 2020 at 17:21 #444669
Quoting Frank Apisa
I have no idea if “no gods exist” or if at least one does. I prefer not to guess on the issue, because all such guesses would be nothing but blind guesses—nothing more than a coin toss.


How reasonable this is depends a lot on what you mean by "exist".

It's fairly obviously the case that our current best empirical theories about the physical world don't include a god or gods. So if existence refers to physical existence, then God or gods don't exist.

There is plenty of empirical evidence for people acting as if they believed in a god of gods, and, making some basic assumptions, it follows that God or gods "exist" fairly commonly as mental idea and as a shared social entity.

If we're talking about metaphysical "existence" in some unfathomable way, the "coin toss" stance seems apt. But the "unfathomable" bit kind of throws a wrench into things. Can something be meaningfully said to "exist" if it's entirely unclear what such "existence" entails? I tend to answer that with a "no".
Frank Apisa August 19, 2020 at 18:12 #444674
Quoting Echarmion
How reasonable this is depends a lot on what you mean by "exist".


Or by what we mean by "How" "reasonable" "this" "is" "depends" etc.

You know what I mean by "exist." Or...make a guess.

echarmion:It's fairly obviously the case that our current best empirical theories about the physical world don't include a god or gods. So if existence refers to physical existence, then God or gods don't exist.


If gods exist...they exist. If humans, the puny beings on this nondescript planet circling this nondescript star in this nondescript galaxy cannot perceive them for some reason...IF THEY EXIST they exist nonetheless.

We do not know if gods exist.

echarmion:There is plenty of empirical evidence for people acting as if they believed in a god of gods, and, making some basic assumptions, it follows that God or gods "exist" fairly commonly as mental idea and as a shared social entity.


We agree on that.


echarmion:If we're talking about metaphysical "existence" in some unfathomable way, the "coin toss" stance seems apt. But the "unfathomable" bit kind of throws a wrench into things. Can something be meaningfully said to "exist" if it's entirely unclear what such "existence" entails? I tend to answer that with a "no".


If gods or ghost or spirits or extradimensional beings exist...despite humans abilities to perceive them in any way...then they exist.

3017amen August 19, 2020 at 18:14 #444675
Quoting Frank Apisa
The two most worthless philosophical protocols are Pascal's Wager and Occam's Razor. I do not use them.


The reason I bring that up is because your 'belief system' (we'll come back to what that means including the concept of belief itself) seems to indicate, that a sort of either/or binary analysis is taking place in your mind, hence, you rolling the dice/Pascal's Wager. And, don't misunderstand, you don't have to buy into anything, I was just making an obvious observation.

Quoting Frank Apisa
In a philosophical discussion (or a religious discussion) the use of "belief" is a way of disguising a guess.


Sort of a glib or insincere response that glossed over then true meaning of holding or having a 'belief', no? We'll come back to what that means (see below list). In the meantime, using logic, think about what it means for human's to have a belief about a some thing, ok?

Quoting Frank Apisa
am sure the people who "believe" there are no gods or who "believe" it is much more likely that there are no gods than that there is at least one...can also enumerate them.

None hold any water.

But give me your best one if you want and we can discuss it.


Quoting Frank Apisa
suppose you would. Just as I would suppose people who guess the other way would argue that your "beliefs" derive from ignorance.


**List of pragmatic, existential, metaphysical and cognitive phenomena, including cosmology and logic:

**Some can easily overlap into other disciplines and/or domains, and this is by no means a comprehensive list

Logic/epistemology:

1. logical possibility
2. logical necessity
3. a priori v. a posteriori
4. synthetic a priori knowledge
5. binary v. dialectic reasoning
6. reason and belief

Phenomenology/Metaphysics:

1. consciousness
2. subjective truth v. objective truth
3. the religious experience
4. revelation
5. NDE
6. music
7. math
8. love
9. instinct
10.sentience

Metaphysics:

1. consciousness
2. self-awareness
3. the will
4. the sense of wonder
5. causation
6. sentience

Cosmology:

1. the illusion of time
2. holographic principle
3. participatory anthropic principle
4. energy
5. gravity
6. causation
7. Panentheism