Does Santa Drive A Helicopter?
This thread is the result of another poster's addition to a thread about something completely different, but I suspect some very interesting discussion could result. It eventually boils down to the question of whether or not Santa exists, and/or exactly how so, or in what sense, or way?
For myself, I'm leaning strongly towards an emphatic "No! Santa does not drive a helicopter" in addition to an equally emphatic...
Santa Claus is a very well-known character in a story that has long since transcended the original storyteller. In doing so, the meaning of the story has evolved accordingly by virtue of retaining, losing, and gaining meaning during each re-telling. In that story, Santa Claus does not fly around in a helicopter delivering toys on Christmas Eve... not yet anyway.
That which does not exist cannot change. Santa has. Santa exists and does not fly around in a helicopter.
:eyes:
For myself, I'm leaning strongly towards an emphatic "No! Santa does not drive a helicopter" in addition to an equally emphatic...
Santa Claus is a very well-known character in a story that has long since transcended the original storyteller. In doing so, the meaning of the story has evolved accordingly by virtue of retaining, losing, and gaining meaning during each re-telling. In that story, Santa Claus does not fly around in a helicopter delivering toys on Christmas Eve... not yet anyway.
That which does not exist cannot change. Santa has. Santa exists and does not fly around in a helicopter.
:eyes:
Comments (32)
Surely someone here would argue that Santa Claus does not exist.
Quoting creativesoul
That's not so.
Elaborate?
I would think that things come from potential to actual. Some call potential nothing. Maybe it's kind of a hybrid of something and nothing, and something falls away from the nothing and walla a big bang
Is that a modus tollens?
Does the story exist? If the story exists, and Santa is a part of that story, then...
Help me out here.
How does something that does not exist... change?
It's more about domains of discourse. Look to the contexts.
Santa lives at least with vegetable level life in many peoples psyches. I don't know exactly how potential becomes actual
That looks a bit off to my eye. Can I have some Santa seedlings?
Domains of discourse?
Care to flesh it out a bit?
Do they exist?
You are having a lend.
Not following...
How does something that does not exist... change?
Like that.
Not quite.
If you asked Santa if Rudolf exists, what would be his answer?
I learned a new word today: Pettifogger.
Suppose one of the elves, taking a metaphysical turn, asked Santa if Rudolf exists...
I just thought the aspect of change was interesting.
It seemed common sense to me. Something that does not exist cannot change. You've simply taken the opposing view that something that does not exist can change.
We are both faced with explaining what that change amounts to and/or consists in. As a result, it seems to me that Santa exists, as a character in a story, and stories change...
For you however... I'm left wondering.
Domains of discourse...
Could you explain how invoking them helps out?
To be is to be the subject of a predicate.
Predicates are predicated inside stories.
Predicates are predicated inside domains of discourse.
That's seems closer to what I'm arguing. How do you arrive at Santa does not exist from that?
Talk of existing and/or existence is fraught, perhaps?
If by "subject" you mean some thing the predicate is (maybe) true of, then fine. If you mean a phrase further along in the sentence, then you are megafogging.
Not saying Santa can't change, if he really wants.