Is Gender Distinction Important?
There has been a lot of controversy on this topic the past several years and I'm curious what everyone thinks. Is there some embedded societal need for gender labeling? Have we outgrown this concept altogether? Would we be better without it?
Comments (9)
At the present moment, women are probably experiencing the aftereffects of millenia of discrimination, especially in education. This is changing rapidly and it won't be long before women equal, and even better, men in the intellectual arena.
That leaves only physical differences in gender to deal with. To get to the point, men are stronger than women but this difference too will not matter once robotics advances to the point where all physical work will be done by robots, either autonomous or remote controlled.
As for women having to carry a pregnancy in her body, medical science will probably make this risky phase in the life of women obsolete.
I don't see any particular need for social genders as such; social roles might be useful, but they don't need to be genders.
My view of gender roles is coincided with typical features, not consistant. The man is usually bigger so he does most of the hard work, the woman is usually more 'compassionate' so tends to the children.
Women are the fairer sex so yeah are usually weaker. Which means they should be protected or at least respected. In a man no one likes a crybaby so he should be able to tough out a considerable amount more, physically and mentally.
Otherwise, I don't think it's that important.
For the most part maybe we should let individuals self identify their gender identity.
Unfortunately that does not work for sports, reproduction or public communal showers.
Biologically most are anatomically male or female with the exception of hermaphrodites and other experiments of nature.
Psychologically there is a great deal of gender identity fluidity and variety.
There are circumstances where biology dictates and others where psychology should dictate.