You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

is etymology a science?

Gregory May 01, 2020 at 19:32 2900 views 5 comments
So.. what is the relationship between cracking codes (like in wartime) and tracing words throughout history? Where do we get our senses of probability when it comes to history and especially etymology? How can one say with certainty "it's unlikely this word did not precede this other one"?

Comments (5)

Zophie May 01, 2020 at 20:09 #408182
Yes. Soft science. Technically, and in view of demarcation, social science; linguistics.

To give some scope, code cracking is about mathematics, etymology is anthropomorphic. They're similar.

For example, Latine implicat totum. Latin ties all. The middle word is root for implication, the last total.

When you have words like this, the evidence is made of letters, like an equation. It's not speculative.
Deleted User May 01, 2020 at 20:11 #408183
This user has been deleted and all their posts removed.
Gregory May 02, 2020 at 15:42 #408459
Quoting tim wood
The Christian Bible seems an example par excellence. Lots of the words can be rendered, but once rendered, readers suppose the modern meanings are accurate, and of course to the extent that the words are modern, they are not accurate. Significance and meaning are lost.


I was thinking something similar. It seems we have more evidence of evolution than we do evidence that Christians truly understand what the Bible means lol
Deleted User May 02, 2020 at 18:17 #408514
This user has been deleted and all their posts removed.
Frank Apisa May 02, 2020 at 18:45 #408526
Quoting Gregory
Gregory
968
So.. what is the relationship between cracking codes (like in wartime) and tracing words throughout history? Where do we get our senses of probability when it comes to history and especially etymology? How can one say with certainty "it's unlikely this word did not precede this other one"?


We cannot say almost anything with certainty...
...but with regard to etymology and "whether this word preceded this other" can be determined by etymologists simply by looking at where and when a word was first used.

Some atheists suggest that the word atheist means without a "belief" in any gods because the word "theist" means "with a belief in a god"...and the prefix "a" means without.

BUT the word atheist came into use in the English language 100 years BEFORE theist...so that derivation cannot be.

Just an example.