Emotions Have History
According to Martha Nussbaum, infancy and childhood emotions influence are current emotions. Our source of comfort, guilt and desire have a root and history that we can even trace back to infancy and childhood. Our adult emotion cannot be fully understood without understanding emotions from infancy and childhood. The way we respond to our emotions like anger may have to do with our emotions during infancy and childhood. Like for example, we hate and we burst in anger, especially to our partners when they break their promise because your father also break his promise when you were young,to be there by your side and support you. Can you guys please share some experience that you can connect your past experience to your current emotions.
Comments (13)
Fancy that.
I am not sure, but did not Martha Nussbaum say that these learned emotional responses go back so early into our relationship with what was our world then, that we don't have any memories of it?
And I am not sure, but why are you crediting M.N. with this, @IsaacMoris, when all this was originally ideated by Sigmund Freud?
And I am not sure, but what is the philsosophical implication you are attempting to draw from this exercis, @isaacmoris?
And I am not sure, but your tone and explanatory style makes me think you think of us as grade 2 pupils. "Now, children, take out your rulers, and draw a straight line in your notebooks. Then draw another straight line across it. Can someone tell me what you just drew?"
Understanding the origin of negative emotions does seem to help with gaining some control over and/or quickly letting go of them.
I have to disparage you, too, @Janus, :-P, but this is the mechanism that Freud employed extensively to treat his so-called neurotic patients.
@uncanni: I have issues too, and mine is the short memory of humankind, which takes an internet ninni such as Martha Nussbaum as source of an idea which is well over a hundred years old.
So what? What's your point?
The point is that you guys, namely @Janus and @MarthaNussbaum think of great ideas the same way as world-class scientists of the past have. If I assume you never became familiar with Freud and his teachings, then you came upon the same great idea by yourself. That's grand.
Please note that I hadn't made a claim to attribute a claim to you which you deny claiming as your claim. I put in a CONDITIONAL phrase that saves my skin. For you to make a claim that I made a pointless claim seems pointless as my claim had been made with a condition, the outcome of which was known to you, but not to me.
(I wonder how long this is going to go on...)
I ask my students if they know what Woodstock was, or who Freud was. Most of them say no.
I grow old, I grow old,
I shall wear the bottom of my trousers rolled...
I doubt that Nussbaum is a ninny, but abreaction is, indeed, Breuer and Freud's terminology. A quick glance at her book, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions, on Amazon reveals that Freud is frequently cited.
But is abreaction really a novel concept? Could we say that Augustine had an abreaction when he resolved his "Whence evil"/split mind problem?