Is a "non-denominational" Christian church just trying not to offend any denomination or trying to
I have been to Christian churches of all different denominations, including a Mormon church (which ironically had a black president, but I won't go there), and while I will admit that there are differences in the things that particular churches do outside of the main Sunday service, in my opinion these things are merely a formality and are adhered to purely for the sake of it and not because the church could not otherwise function like any other church, regardless of its denomination or lack thereof. If there is any evidence of this, it is perhaps the fact that pretty much every church that I have attended has had the same or similar messages and talked about similar things during the Sunday service, and really the only difference was in things that they did either during or outside of the service that perhaps a different denomination may or may not do in the same respect. But like I said, when you take away the extras, I believe you will find that all Christian churches are more or less exactly the same. Moreover, I feel as if any Christian of a particular denomination would have to be pretty conservative and stubborn to say they are attending a particular church solely because it does certain things that another denomination does not do, when the differences are often too subtle to be taken incredibly seriously. I feel like a non-denominational church understands this sentiment, and therefore they act as a middle man and provide a gray area for those who are neutral and don't want to seem biased to a particular denomination. I also feel like they have created a vulnerability in doing this, as they have allowed people not to be partial to a particular denomination, whereas in the past this may not have been possible. Still, the fact that there exists a non-denominational church is in my opinion an attempt to bring forth the concept of people forming their own opinions as opposed to having to adhere to societal norms. So basically I just wonder if non-denominational churches exist on behalf of people who don't want to adhere to the rules or concepts of a particular denomination, but who would instead rather be completely free of any of these rules. I feel as if this is a good thing to have available, but I also wonder if the other denominations feel as if it undermines their efforts or makes them seem to "strict" for lack of a better word. Personally I have never felt this way as part of any church except for the Mormon church which I subsequently stopped attending, but like it or not these churches still have a particular concept and a set of rules which non-denominational churches more or less do not have.
Comments (9)
Eventually…
The stodgy elevation of doctrine over ethics
Will no longer carry the day, and there will be less
Emphasis on believing, with more on belonging.
All will become more democratic, with much singing.
The Bible will be seen to be of human construction,
A result of human instinct, frailty, fear, and no wisdom;
So people actively speaking to each other, with laughter,
Will come to replace passive readings from scripture.
(In my church, all denominations are accepted: twenties, fifties, and hundred dollar bills.)
Sounds like your not a Christian. lol Please don't reply with the typical response "and proud of it". Try to make your response not sound like it was copy pasted from some other Atheist on some other philosophy forum. Readers enjoy comedy and originality. :)
No, I'm not a Christian, but kind of an honorary one, since I take someone to the Vineyard Church and go to their events. I don't attend the services. All posted poems are my own, and I would attribute when they aren't. Don't worry about your thinking otherwise. The denomination joke is common, though, and not mine, as a nod to churches needing money, too, to survive.
thats fair. Personally i think for relatively younger people, outdoor churches are the answer in order to save money. Most church messages are trite and repetitive so if we miss a church service due to it being rained out, i don't see any harm in that.
And the separate question, what is a church?
I remember as a child growing up in the south and in a church that felt like home. Things changed when I was assigned outside the country, came home and got married, and lived for many years in foreign places, then spent a decade in developing countries. We met many thoughtful believers along the way.
The simplistic theology of my youth was disassembled and reassembled many times, and my wife similarly had her belief system broken down to reality. While our faith was perhaps rattled from time to time, we were never left alone, even in the dark times.
In the end after decades, we're still serious believers and untroubled by the differences among denominations. :)
The helpful folks with whom we've crossed paths are perhaps a bit more clearly focused on the actual reason for being together.
Seems reasonable, since the thrust of "The Church" from the get-go was to preach the Gospel of salvation. All Christian churches share the same foundation document (NT).
I have nothing against the Mormons, but they are beyond "denomination" and head into heresy and new religion. Their peculiar set of beliefs place them outside Christian theology. That said, they do a fine job of missionary work, they have numerous healthy social practices, and, of course, their great choir in Salt Lake City, the Mormon Tabernacle Cheese Press (as one sarcastic guy called it).
The Church (all of them) are continuing to decline, and religion is continuing to evolve and devolve. There is perfectly normal, and we should not lament it.
What is lamentable is the extent to which real estate concerns drive the church. Lots of institutions the world over have edifice complexes, and that is certainly true in the United States. I love a nicely done building, but for churches, the needs of the building drive the program of the church. Keeping the thing up takes so much money (the roof, the heating/ac system, drainage and leakage problems, repainting, the mortgage, etc.). Then there is well paid staff, office equipment, healthcare plans, and so forth. After all that, the churches do not have enough money left over for the corporal works of mercy, to do much about feeding the hungry, caring for the sick, visiting those in prison clothing the naked, teaching the untaught, and so on--which should be their primary concern.
As for WHY there are so many denominations, it's because the US never had an established church, or law limiting the formation of churches--as still is the case in some European countries. The process of denomination formation (biologically speaking, its meiosis rather than mitosis) has kept the churches more vigorous in the US than in countries with established churches. That's my theory, anyway.
With time - if you're interested in it - it will emerge what this means in terms of their doctrines and practices. You are then free to evaluate those things as you please and relate at any level or no level, as you wish.
Some of these are cageyer than others, about important issues.
With a lifetime's practice, one develops a discernment capability!