How should you define yourself???
I am new to the forum and altogether to the world of philosophy so bare with me and my thoughts, they maybe rubbish but am confident that all your input will give me a great amount of knowledge. So here we go>>>
I would say for all of us if not some of us it is easy to define ourselves? For examples, who you are and where are you from and so on....those and similarly all are subjective to oneself.......so that I can do somehow.....
What I want to understand, how do you put your ideas straight forward without hurting someone or in the process yourself......i mean ideas in the context of who you actually are?? Did i shape myself? my thoughts? or they are simply a continuation of my decedents? Do I have at all anything of myself? or all is a process of the society and all around me?
I would say for all of us if not some of us it is easy to define ourselves? For examples, who you are and where are you from and so on....those and similarly all are subjective to oneself.......so that I can do somehow.....
What I want to understand, how do you put your ideas straight forward without hurting someone or in the process yourself......i mean ideas in the context of who you actually are?? Did i shape myself? my thoughts? or they are simply a continuation of my decedents? Do I have at all anything of myself? or all is a process of the society and all around me?
Comments (9)
It will be easy to define yourself if you were in that state as all your characters would be the same as yourself. There would be no change from day 1 to the infinity....
Although us humans do not have that quality or luxury, therefore to me every second of our lives will have a different definition...
What I am after is how do we collectively define yourself with all these mix characters that we are facing through the change of time....
If you believe that a part of you is constant then you should know of it, or if not then your mind is telling you that you being constant can be constant in a different period of time, which to me can be a vague idea....
That being said mind can tell you anything, but the reality is different, and that's how or we can call the mind games which can be so vast that has no attachment to the reality....
Does it make any sense?
For lack of a better analogy, allow me to use soup. There are carrots, onions, water, meat. etc.
All of these on their own are ingredients, but mixed together they are soup. So is man - the soup of many ingredients and likewise yet an ingredient.
Does man have any control over the way man is? Certainly, to the extent that freedom would allow it.
Man is free to transmute oneself in to anything available. Now in truth, this would imply anything that is, but in practice man cannot transmute oneself in to something that isn't evident.
Said in simpler words: Man cannot change or be, what he cannot imagine.
Now again, a problem of practice arises; how does man change in to a bird, for instance?
Now, the bird is evident, but the method of change from man to bird is not evident.
And one must first become the method, before one becomes the bird.
Simply put: There is a gap, and no bridge.
As to how to present one's ideas in a manner that doesn't hurt - simply do not intend harm.
That does not mean that we do not hold to opinions, with passion! But we (should) hold our convictions loosely, with cautious introspection, knowing how our beliefs and opinions have changed, and leaving room for further enlightenment..
The quest for Truth is what matters. Lies and deception are all around, to trip us up in that quest. A wise person spots the lies, and avoids them.
I'm curious, how do you square that sentiment with your avatar's slogan "live free or DIE"?