You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Why are mental representations semantically selective?

Josh Alfred March 28, 2019 at 08:28 1725 views 4 comments
Is it all about the logical properties of a representation?

Does a representation have a "something" that creates a discernment between any comparable subjects (semantically)?

What causes the diversity of mental representation?

What is the basis for this specific function?

Any suggested: reading or subject material?

Comments (4)

I like sushi March 28, 2019 at 08:39 #269792
Can you give some examples/context please?
SethRy March 28, 2019 at 08:59 #269795
By representation do you mean, something reprising a role of a primary subject or merely just an assumption?
sime March 28, 2019 at 09:40 #269802
It sounds like you are describing the problem of clustering; for any collection of elements that are pairwise related by some measure of similarity, how many clusters are there, and where are the boundaries?

One potential criticism of this formulation, is that it assumes the notion of an element as an axiom from which the cluster-membership of elements is inferred, as well as an a priori metric of similarity. It is a logically atomic model that models clustering as a type of induction.

Perhaps this could be circumvented by treating elements as being another type of relation that is itself a relation between similarity relations(!), such that every subset of relations is understood to be a sub-configuration of a semantically inseparable whole structure. I'm thinking of Tensor Algebra here, as is used in Quantum Field Theory to describe entanglement between an undetermined number of particles that are themselves defined in terms of a global field fluctuation.
Terrapin Station March 28, 2019 at 12:20 #269838
It might help if you explain what led you to this question. (Even if the explanation is simply citing a journal article or something like that.)