Why are mental representations semantically selective?
Is it all about the logical properties of a representation?
Does a representation have a "something" that creates a discernment between any comparable subjects (semantically)?
What causes the diversity of mental representation?
What is the basis for this specific function?
Any suggested: reading or subject material?
Does a representation have a "something" that creates a discernment between any comparable subjects (semantically)?
What causes the diversity of mental representation?
What is the basis for this specific function?
Any suggested: reading or subject material?
Comments (4)
One potential criticism of this formulation, is that it assumes the notion of an element as an axiom from which the cluster-membership of elements is inferred, as well as an a priori metric of similarity. It is a logically atomic model that models clustering as a type of induction.
Perhaps this could be circumvented by treating elements as being another type of relation that is itself a relation between similarity relations(!), such that every subset of relations is understood to be a sub-configuration of a semantically inseparable whole structure. I'm thinking of Tensor Algebra here, as is used in Quantum Field Theory to describe entanglement between an undetermined number of particles that are themselves defined in terms of a global field fluctuation.