Is suffering inherently meaningful?

Reply to Posty McPostface

Hey, Posty.

Is meaning inherently sufferingful?

Yes.

Reply to Posty McPostface I wonder if perhaps the meaning of it all is to create the meaning of it all. And it seems quite unconditional that way. When the meaning I create is that 'I am suffering', and I get caught up and identified with that meaning, then indeed I truly feel that I am suffering. When the meaning I create is that 'I am not suffering', then that meaning feels just as true. I suppose the question then becomes can we make the conscious choice, one way or the other, of which meaning to apply and identify with?

Just one personal example. Having been abused as a child, both in an emotional and corporeal way, much of my life was spent in 'I am suffering' mode. At some point, when I bottomed out, so to speak, having had enough of that meaning, I consciously switched to 'I am not suffering ' mode. Lately though, I just try to stay in 'I am' mode, with out the optional add-ons and identifications :)

Reply to Posty McPostface No, suffering is not inherently meaningful, and I am sorry you are suffering, whatever the cause.

Back in the 1980s and early 1990s when gay men generally died of AIDS in prolonged suffering, some claimed to be grateful for AIDS because they had found meaning in life. (The guys saying this were the ones still walking around. The ones who had reached end-stage weren't expressing gratitude.)

I always thought this "AIDS helped me find meaning in life" was a total crock. What probably helped them find meaning, if they indeed had, was that they had been drafted into a community of diseased pariahs who gained fellowship in shared suffering and mutual support.

That sounds harsh, but at the time there was a lot of malarky going around.

People who are very sick or severely injured often suffer miserably before they die. Were the dying to be tended and all watched over by machines of loving grace‡, without human companionship, there would be NO MEANING found in their suffering. Meaning comes from human context.

The tragedy of isolation, alienation, atomization, and allied states is that when we are cut off from human fellowship, and everything becomes meaningless. Suffering is bad, and without companionship, suffering is further aggravated by meaninglessness.



‡"All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace - Richard Brautigan, 1935 - 1984, a 'beat poet' among other genres

I like to think (and
the sooner the better!)
of a cybernetic meadow
where mammals and computers
live together in mutually
programming harmony
like pure water
touching clear sky.

I like to think
(right now, please!)
of a cybernetic forest
filled with pines and electronics
where deer stroll peacefully
past computers
as if they were flowers
with spinning blossoms.

I like to think
(it has to be!)
of a cybernetic ecology
where we are free of our labors
and joined back to nature,
returned to our mammal
brothers and sisters,
and [B]all watched over
by machines of loving grace[/B].

Suffering is not inherently meaningful.
However, you may as well make the proverbial lemonade out of it if you are unlucky enough to be the recipient of great suffering. But you do have to be inclined to do so. Some people live through atrocities and never get over it, others use it to put the rest of life in perspective and find great joy in their existence. Accounts from holocaust survivors often include a sense of general joy in life since being freed, since how can the trivialities of everyday life bother you much if you've seen the absolute pits of human despair?
I also a read a good psychology article a few weeks ago that talked about the difference of perception between optimistic and pessimistic people which probably pertains to this. Basically, optimists will focus on "I survived! Lucky me!" While pessimists will dwell on "poor me, I suffered..." Which is not to condemn the latter, but it does change how well you can deal with what has happened to you.

Quoting Bitter Crank

Back in the 1980s and early 1990s when gay men generally died of AIDS in prolonged suffering, some claimed to be grateful for AIDS because they had found meaning in life. (The guys saying this were the ones still walking around. The ones who had reached end-stage weren't expressing gratitude.)

I remember hearing an early HIV +ve guy interviewed on this. He said the diagnosis really shook him (unsurprisingly). Although traumatised, for months his mind took on kind of vivd high - seemingly wringing out every last drop of sentience in the time remaining.

Luckily for him, retroviral drugs came online in time. Now he's back to experiencing all the petty irritations and trivialities with the rest of us. Welcome back dude!

Reply to Bitter Crank Wonderful poem ... I must seek out more Brautigan.

For sure, suffering while dying, with all of the fear, grief and despair that can entail, is another category altogether. But that too can be quite mysterious has to how it unfolds. I've seen folks, like my mother, die in psychological turmoil, while others in seemingly similar dire conditions pass away quite peacefully, as if they've seen that proverbial unconditional loving light, spoken of in NDE accounts that are now so pervasive on youtube. And what of Steve Jobs' now famous last words ... "Oh wow! Oh wow!! Oh wow!!!

Speaking of poetry, my mom's passing did inspire a poem, if I may be allowed to share, given its relevance to suffering ...

[i]As I sat in that cathedral of life and death,
how many lives were born and lost
within the rooms of its labyrinth halls?
And where was god watching from?
As I gazed into the dazzling geometry
of its crystalline ceiling, did I see
the myriad crosses of Flanders repeated
there? During the countless hours
I waited, I tried in vain to count them,
until I could not bear them any more.
Strange, how one skin-cloaked skeleton
could radiate such beauty and light,
while yours, that shell of your being,
housed only darkness and despair.
And so I brought those fading photos
to remember your lost beauty and light,
to mask the pain and fear in your eyes.
And yet they too became unbearable,
as I sat helplessly by your side,
while some irrevocable karmic will
pulled your hand from mine. I tried
my love to read the failing words
upon your lips, believe me I tried,
but they also became too hard to bear.
And where was god listening from?
While everywhere around us, others
shared our grief, the angels of our ward
went about their gracious business,
as they warded over us. So I borrowed
their dauntless spirit, as they bravely bore
the infinite weight of our untold tears.
And I prayed that perhaps deliverance
might find a way into the darkest depths
of your sleeping soul, and prayed somehow,
somewhere, an angel was waiting to do
what I could bear to do no longer …
and that some god was waiting too.[/i]

Reply to Noble Dust :rofl:

Quoting Posty McPostface

[...] and the consensus seems to be that life would not have meaning if it were devoid of suffering.

The term “suffering” can imply a lot of different things. I like it's etymology: roughly paraphrased, the need to support some unwanted weight or burden (under + I carry). This as compared to the approximate etymology of happiness: to be lucky in having things go as you want them to (fortunate). My etymological interpretations are obviously debatable, but thinking of things in this way helps me out.

For the forms of suffering I’m currently thinking of, suffering is merely nature’s way of telling you there’s something wrong—be if physically or psychologically, including depressions. Some of these wrong things in life can be changed more readily than others, and others cannot. Still, in my life of varying experiences, thinking of suffering in these terms has helped me not succumb to suffering in the long term … for this mindset presents suffering as a given which one can do something about, even if only in the slightest way, by remedying that which is existentially wrong and the cause to ones suffering.

Then, if suffering is nature’s way of telling you there’s something wrong, than not suffering could likely be more meaningful. As in: being on the right path is more meaningful than being on a wrong one.

Yea, it’s a perspective at any rate.

Reply to javra Yes, salient points. Some suffering can seem like a call for attention from the obfuscated, unresolved 'stuff' deeply repressed in the subconscious. When I wrote above that I made the move from 'I am suffering' mode to 'I am not suffering' mode, it was not without unloading of a lot of suppressed psychological baggage in the process. It was as if the conscious choice to move on from it, was like permission to let go and stop holding onto that baggage, allowing it to be unpacked, sorted through, and then disposed of, so to speak. It was a painful process, to say the least, but in the end, more than worth it. It is as if some great somatic weight is literally lifted from the body-mind.

And also I learned that forgiveness was a huge part of it, and not just tacit forgiveness, but actually spoken from the heart, along with giving voice to the thought-forms associated with those buried emotions. It all seems to become entangled somehow.

So I guess the meaning I got out of it was that we don't have to carry that sh*t around our whole life, and such healing can be bliss. Albeit, that suffering may have inspired some poetry, as is often the case for artists of all kinds ... thinking of Van Gogh, or Beethoven, or any number of other examples.

Quoting snowleopard

It was as if the conscious choice to move on from it, was like permission to let go and stop holding onto that baggage, allowing it to be unpacked, sorted through, and then disposed of, so to speak. It was a painful process, to say the least, but in the end, more than worth it.

Man, I could make use with some of that willpower myself every now and then. Congrats. A lot easier said than done, but definitely rewarding when accomplished.

Quoting snowleopard

Albeit, that suffering may have inspired some poetry, as is often the case for artists of all kinds ... thinking of Van Gogh, or Beethoven, or any number of other examples.

A little rant:

In my younger days I used to rail against anti-depressants to anyone I could debate the subject with. “It’s in our genes and must be fixed chemically.” Bullshit. I guess just as some people are birthed without appendages some might be birthed with genetically fixed mental ailments. But when you see a bunch of people returning from war with missing limbs and proclaim that they were born that way, there’s something sinister at work. Same with depressions and the like: they a response to a long list of prior experiences. And having the pharmaceutical companies peddle more drugs to more people, now even to kids, is not going to resolve the near epidemic of depression we as a society are going through. OK, all this imo.

To me there’s suffering and then there’s strife. The two are not the same—and neither is fully escape-able for any life. When suffering becomes strife—rather than apathy or learned-hopelessness (since it hurts to not succeed, even learned-hopelessness can be a heuristic to minimize one’s dolor, I’m thinking)—a good deal of wisdom and beauty often ensues from successfully overcoming one’s challenges in life. At least the practical kinds for all of us unenlightened ones. Strife was the impetus for some of the greatest wonders that humanity has to offer: in the arts, the sciences, an in philosophy, wherever it fits in.

I can’t imagine a world where the two you’ve mention and many others would have all been given anti-depressants. Well, personally, other than imagining a zombie like humanity where nothing meaningful every gets addressed … a Fahrenheit 451 kind of reality.

OK, spewed off again about this issue; no longer as Quixotic about it but it still seems to me to matter. For the record, I agree that medications can be a very useful crutch faciliating one’s capcity to walk, and all individual cases are unique. Still, societally, our increased quantity of depressions are not due to a human gene mutation that just occurred in the last few decades … or so I maintain.

Long story short, my obnoxiousness aside, I agree. The strife propelled by suffering is often of benefit to our being human. I’ll take the Stoic depth that occasionally looks into the void over fluffiness most any day—especially if there’s some humor occasionally involved.

Reply to javra I tend to agree about the over prescribing of anti-depressants, and other chemical masking of the underlying trauma and other unresolved emotional issues. No doubt the chemistry is out of balance, and it can be artificially, if temporarily, corrected in some way. But as long as the underlying issues are left to fester away, then it's jut dealing with the symptoms and not healing the dis-ease -- not that relieving symptoms is not warranted, but not at to the exclusion of true healing.

Ironically enough though, we're discovering that there are 'drugs' that can be effective tools for actually facilitating healing, as new research and clinical trials are showing that some psychedelics, like MDA and psilocybin, may be the key to unlocking that baggage, by allowing access to the subconscious realm were it is locked up, so as to start the true healing process, in conjunction with more conventional gestalt therapy, etc. So far the early results are proving to be very promising, with respect to bringing about profound and lasting change that doesn't just mask the suffering, but digs deep to get to the source and finally resolve it.

Quoting snowleopard

Ironically enough though, we're discovering that there are 'drugs' that can be effective tools for actually facilitating healing, as new research and clinical trials are showing that some psychedelics, like MDA and psilocybin, may be the key to unlocking that baggage, by allowing access to the subconscious realm were it is locked up, so as to start the true healing process, in conjunction with more conventional gestalt therapy, etc. So far the early results are proving to be very promising, with respect to bringing about profound and lasting change that doesn't just mask the suffering, but digs deep to get to the source and finally resolve it.

Yes, I'm aware of this from a documentary or two. I agree it would be beneficial. But then, how would the pharmaceutical companies maintain stock profits if all their patients became cured? Kind of thing. This is worthy of mention, I think, but I don't want to get into the politics of current economy.

I wish I had something meaningful to say. I've been going through you name it, and it's no fun. I really wish things would get easier, as I thought they would with time; but, the depression still lingers and haunts me.

I'm lucky to have a caring mother, though. Man, it really sucks to complain so much, and God knows I do it a lot. Such misery.

Reply to javra Well supposedly there's much optimism that these so-called entheogens will be approved for clinical usage in the psychiatric field in the near future -- aiming for 2020 perhaps. So who knows what will eventually unfold, and how the pharmaceutical giants will be impacted, if at all. Within the context of the prevailing paradigm it's hard to imagine that there won't be some profit motive in play. But I try not to be pessimistic or cynical about it, as that seems to be a depressingly pointless option, and what good does that do?

Reply to Posty McPostface Maybe there is some way you could get into one of those clinical trials I mentioned. If not, one can only hold out hope that they will bring about a more viable option accessible to all long term sufferers of psychological disorders, like PTSD, chronic depression and anxiety, etc, in the very near future.

By the way, I should state the usual disclaimer here that I am not a medical professional, or healer of any kind, so any advice taken here should be done so in the context of seeking expert information within the usual medical and healing modalities that are available.

Reply to snowleopard

I'm already on powerful medication. Either it's still not working or my depression is getting worse. Though, I doubt my depression is getting worse. I've tried cocktails of various drugs and have even tried entheogens once, which gave me psychosis. I have thought about suicide sometimes; but, I don't think I'll ever do it due to not wanting my mother to go through grief. I also doubt I would ever have the courage to do it.

Trying to think positive, I don't have any immediate suffering or any reason to suffer. I have someone that cares about me, and that's all I think that really matters? I'm just tired of suffering or wallowing in my misery.

Quoting snowleopard

Well supposedly there's much optimism that these so-called entheogens will be approved for clinical usage in the psychiatric field in the near future -- aiming for 2020 perhaps. So who knows what will eventually unfold, and how the pharmaceutical giants will be impacted, if at all. Within the context of the prevailing paradigm it's hard to imagine that there won't be some profit motive in play. But I try not to be pessimistic or cynical about it, as that seems to be a depressingly pointless option, and what good does that do?

Though I should leave your last post to be as is, but, to be clear, I fully agree that a healthy, reality-grounded optimism is always a good thing to have. It would be nice if this new avenue was to become legally implemented for society at large. I’ve heard it is an optimal remedy for alcoholism, opioid addiction, among other things, as well as very beneficial for (I liked the way you worded it) mental dis-ease / dis-order.

And ditto to this: Reply to snowleopard

Reply to Posty McPostface

Just read you’re last post. I really wish there were some way I could help out, but I get that talk if often cheap. There's a Romanian saying that sums up what worked for me at least once in my life; loosely translated: appetite [sometimes] arrives subsequent to eating. Meaning: forcing or cajoling oneself to do something one does not desire, has no appetite for, sometimes stimulates you into gaining an appetite for the activity. I started listening to upbeat music while taking my sorrow and frustrations out on a punching bag, or while pushing myself in running or biking, and eventually my appetite for life came back. The point being, maybe if you push yourself to do something you formally liked or wanted to do, it might eventually help get you out of the bad times. Whatever works, but don't give up trying.

Reply to Posty McPostface Again, I'm not advocating mixing psychedelics with your current medications, which would be clearly ill-advised and outright foolish. Also, I'm assuming when you say that you've tried psychedelics in the past that you're referring to some kind of casual usage, in perhaps a recreational context. Again, this is most certainly not what I am suggesting, and would be ill-advised. This should only be considered in conjunction with a formal clinical trial, with the support of experts who know what they're doing. And it may well be that it's not the right route or therapy for you, if there is some other psychosis coming into play. As always, get the best advise possible, before trying anything where you're not sure about about the possible risks involved.

Quoting Posty McPostface

Is there any inherent meaning in suffering?

I wonder what the posters above would have answered had the question been

Is there any inherent meaning to happiness?

Everyone sees the purpose of happiness in their lives for it is easy to see and explain its meaning, to make us want to keep on living. Some believe it is a part of evolution that makes us seek happiness so as to continue the race.
But it is definitely not easy to figure out what part of evolution suffering can fulfill. Maybe it is to stop us doing dangerous things that we have seen others do. But that does not seem to work because mankind loves to go to war. It does not explain suffering because of unwanted illness and situations not of our causing.

I have often wondered why so many religions have the belief that suffering is the way to heaven. It seems as though the god has some sort of sadistic intentions toward his creation. Sort of like "Let me see you hurting now and I'll pay you for it later".

Personally I don't think there is any inherent meaning to anything about life, it is just a matter of you having it so make what you can of it.

Reply to javra

I have to say that my suffering is also self inflicted in many ways. I have (had) an addiction to stimulant drugs to get me up and going, it has also been a form of self medicating ADD. Whenever I have indulged in stimulant drugs, there has always been a price to pay. Meaning, that all that dopamine gets depleted and then you end up strung out.

Now, the important question that I am asking myself is why do I engage in this self destructive behavior constantly? This must have been the n'th time I have bought some stuff online and taken it for a while and then suffered the consequences. In some sadistic or strange sense, I keep on punishing myself by this reckless and idiotic behavior. I have squandered my money, dropped out of college, and live hopelessly because of this. I don't mean to complain; but, I deserve my suffering in some sense, and that realization is quite important to me.

Reply to Posty McPostface

Don’t laugh, and I don’t mean to compare difficulties of addiction by this, but I can relate to some of what you say on account of my own nicotine addiction. Started smoking to … alleviate my stress, as they say; went from being Mr. health guy—five miles of running a day and all that—to over three packs of filterless per day almost overnight when I first started. Told myself I’ll show everybody else that I can quit in one’s years’ time; it’s been, um, over one year now and I still pretty much choose to smoke each new day. This despite the costs to my wallet and my body. Why? I’m certain that there are reasons in my skull somewhere, but I’ll be damned if I can make out what these cogent reasons are … again, not for the by now recurrent cravings but for my choosing to satisfy them.

Between us two addicts of various sorts, I think that acceptance of this not being right is a good first step. As to figuring out the buried reasons, maybe like others, I neither have the cash nor the trust to sit around with shrinks so as to bring them up to consciousness. Even so, at this point, I figure, the reasons don’t very much matter anymore. That advice I gave previously, it equally applies to me. It’s about forming new habits and reclaiming very old ones … and then letting these old reasons for our current choices dissipate themselves away. Still, I intuitively sense that blaming ourselves for choosing what we’ve chosen on account of these buried reasons only gets in the way of a healthy recovery. In a way, if you’d like, we’ve already had our fair share of punishment—not only by what got us here to begin with but also by the respective aftermaths of so first choosing our now addictions.

Yes, there’s a willpower required to stop, but for this willpower there is also required a goal which we earnestly latch onto and, on my part at least, a kind of letting go of fears that I don’t often look in the eye … those that the addiction numbs, issues and pains that I’d rather never be aware of again.

You know, among all the talk of forgiveness … there’s a kind out there that might be more important than all others, that of self-forgiveness.

More generally speaking, don’t care who you are, you are not devoid of all blame, not innocent of all wrongs. Some don’t give a damn—else perpetually justify to themselves why they’re righteous and why this accumulated guilt doesn't apply to them. But for those of us who do given a damn, self-forgivingness might be … well, yea, difficult, but then also an important part of healing and letting go of these downward spiral habits. Still, I strongly believe, we should be just with ourselves in not blaming ourselves for more than what we deserve; not merciful as though we’re giving ourselves a hand out out of self-pity, but fair.

Hey, just speaking my mind. Hopefully some of it clicks with your situation as well. At any rate, all this talk is maybe helping me out with more definitively wanting to quit nicotine again, in a hopefully more permanent sort of way. Have to now push myself to do some chores, but I’ll check back in later.

Quoting Sir2u

Is there any inherent meaning to happiness?

I’ll argue this way: Happiness is meaningful. One emotive sensation is both discerned from others and is either wanted or shun only because it is meaningful. Upheld differently, happiness holds significance to us—and because of this is meaningful, i.e. endowed with meaning.

As to it being inherently so, this comes with prioritizing being/awareness over reasoning, imo. Here I take words to of themselves be an aspect of reasoning--and reasoning devoid of being/awareness is, or would be, meaningless. Hence happiness, as much as “soul’s” suffering (however poetically “soul” is addressed), is an inherent aspect of our being/awareness ... thereby being inherently meaningful.

Get ahold of yourself!

Quoting javra

As to it being inherently so, this comes with prioritizing being/awareness over reasoning, imo.

Neither suffering nor happiness are essential parts of life, we can all live without them. I agree that we all search for and enjoy happiness and avoid suffering when possible.
But.
Love and hate, attraction and revulsion, happiness and sadness, happiness and suffering are all conditions of life. The fact that we prefer some over others does not make them less inherent in life for they are in everyone's lives whether we want them or not.

Which brings us back to the forever unanswered question.

Does life have a meaning?

Quoting Sir2u

Neither suffering nor happiness are essential parts of life, we can all live without them. I agree that we all search for and enjoy happiness and avoid suffering when possible.
But.
Love and hate, attraction and revulsion, happiness and sadness, happiness and suffering are all conditions of life. The fact that we prefer some over others does not make them less inherent in life for they are in everyone's lives whether we want them or not.

Myself, I take it that all affective states—emotions and moods—will hold what in psychology is termed a positive valence or a negative valence … which in humans at least roughly equates to some interpretations of happiness and suffering. With some affective states sometime being in-between and thereby of relatively neutral valence, but I take this to be rare in comparison to pleasant and unpleasent states we feel, act on account of, and react to. Going by this, I’d again uphold that happiness and suffering so understood in broad terms hold inherent meaning to us. We might be using the words differently though.

Quoting Sir2u

Which brings us back to the forever unanswered question.

Does life have a meaning?

Implicit to this is to whom. My life has meaning to me, as I’m quite certain yours does to you. Sometimes, on better days, some of our lives will also have meaning interpresonally. But no life will have meaning to a rock.

A more practical way of saying it depends with what premise one starts with.

Quoting Bitter Crank

Get ahold of yourself!

As though the thread wasn’t complicated enough, you have to go and bring up an infinite regress problem of all things. Let it be, I say. Practical philosophizing can be cool too (unless one’s an asshole that can’t help but bullshit due to so being :razz: )

Emotions … can’t live with them, can’t live without ‘em.



Back to pushing myself to engage in chores needing to be done. … thereby here introducing a Munchhausen problem to rival yours.

Reply to Posty McPostface
I think a good follow-up question is whether existence is inherently suffering. On the surface, one might be inclined to say that the world is objectively indifferent and it is what we make of it. However, if concepts from philosophies like Buddhism and Schopenhauer are correct, it is in our very animal nature to suffer as we are always willing and willing in this view brings on dissatisfaction.

The Existentialists would say that the world is also inherently absurd. Because of our need for meaning and the indifference of the universe to give an answer, it has an aspect of a bad joke. The planets revolve around this gaseous ball of fire about every 365 days, the planet rotates every 24 hours or so, we survive, clean and maintain our little habitat, and seek some short or long term goal to bide our time.

You know that feeling you get after you think you completed something of great fulfillment? Perhaps an enlightening conversation, an end to a large project, or played some good music? It's that feeling of "Now what?" and back to the world of dissatisfaction you go. There is no gestalt at the end of the rainbow. It is just the world revolving continuously for a lifetime.

We are imbued with language that structures the world in such a way that makes us efficient creators of technology. This novel string of language generation/concept formation/ and technological manipulation creates a sort of pseudo-meaning- we are the animals that manipulate tools and thoughts in an endless novel stream of iterative and novel generation.

However, this is also just a post-industrial narrative that we tell ourselves that gives a sheen of gloss over the absurd core at the center of our little umwelt that we create with our tools, social, and language structures. It's all just planets moving around a ball of gas.

Reply to Posty McPostface Does joy have meaning?

If you look at all the happy people you won't find them saying ''happiness is what I wanted''. Instead the usual response would be ''x makes me happy and I want to do it''. The ''x'' being something other than emotion.

Is this important? I think so. Joy and suffering are motivators of some kind. Depending on how an x makes you feel you either pursue it or you avoid it.

It is this x that is the source of meaning. Joy and happiness are just their to guide you. They aren't objectives in themselves although one would be hard pressed to see this distinction.

The rational mind needs to engage the cause of both joy and suffering. I haven't tried it because thinking is hard but I daresay you'll find that sometimes one is feeling an emotion (joy/sorrow and everything between) for no reason at all.

So much for happiness or suffering.

Well, I have a small update to offer as a result of my suffering that I self induced.

I have to say that suffering might not be inherently meaningful; but, it sure makes life all the more worthwhile once it is over. Hence, my nagging suspicion that if one can endure suffering of whatever magnitude or degree, then life does become more meaningful in some regards. In my case it resulted in appreciating life more than usual.

I think suffering is negative experience for life. It could destroy the soul of the sufferer, and it is not pleasant to have any type of suffering.

Good life is about having longest and most possible comfort and joy. Hence I would say suffering is harmful and inherently meaningless.

Reply to Posty McPostface Everything in life serves a purpose. And no, you are not obliged to do anything you do not wish to do...

The problem with "suffering" is that people seem to use it for such a wide variety of things. And they always seem to want to use it with a negative connotation, but when you press what they're referring to in light of skepticism re the usual "everyone suffers regularly" shtick, they wind up saying things like, "One is suffering when one has any desire that's not met," but I don't see that as sufficient to be negative.

Say I have a desire to be able to be invisible at will. Well, that desire isn't going to be met, but in my view it's ridiculous to say that I'm suffering because that desire isn't met.

Or say, moving away from the realm of fantasy desires, that I desire to have a bigger home than I do. That desire might be difficult to meet, too, but if my home is more than adequate--enough so that I even have a ton of stuff that I don't really need, without my home being cluttered, then it seems ridiculous to say that I'm suffering because my desire to have a bigger home isn't met.

Or even if I'm in some physical discomfort. Maybe I'm sore from an intense workout at the gym. I'd rather not be sore, ideally (even though I know that being sore means that I'm working out enough to build rather than simply maintain muscle and so on), but it's not something that bothersome. It's nothing like the pain of a broken bone or something like that--in fact, I wouldn't even say it's pain at all; just an awareness I don't usually have. So again it seems kind of ridiculous to me to say that I'm "suffering," as something negative enough that it suggests being addressed, just because I'm slightly sore from a workout.

Quoting Posty McPostface

...and the consensus seems to be that life would not have meaning if it were devoid of suffering.

Suffering and meaning are two sides of the same coin. Meaning is a story that we like, and suffering is a story that we don't like.

I would agree that some amount of suffering is inevitable, given that suffering arises out of the nature of thought, and we have to think to survive. But we are not required to think every minute of our lives.

Many or most of us spend our lives wrestling with the good story vs. the bad story. But there is another option. Turn the story machine off, or at least turn the volume down.

Wrestling with the good story vs. bad story can be a bottomless pit of endless complication. On the other hand, turning down the volume of the story making machine is a fairly straightforward mechanical matter.

Which option is more logical?

Reply to Jake As the old-time (50 years ago) Catholics used to say about suffering, "offer it up".

Quoting JoliJoleen

Everything in life serves a purpose. And no, you are not obliged to do anything you do not wish to do...

That's arguable. I think everything in life can serves a purpose. Whether they actually do is another question.

"Inherent" is a dangerous term to use on a philosophy forum, but lets leave that discussion for another time.

Suffering isn't meaningful unless one seeks the meaning of it. But is it worthwhile to look for meaning in suffering? My answer to that question is yes.

The suffering is happening to you regardless. Looking for a meaning or a lesson to learn from it allows one to learn and turn it into something positive. Perhaps not all suffering, but a lot of suffering is caused by ourselves, so it's within ourselves to prevent it from happening again.
Looking for meaning in suffering may make the suffering itself more bearable. If one looks at suffering as though it happens because the universe is against them and they carry no blame, that's not constructive and I can't imagine that mindset to be helpful. As the old saying goes "What doesn't kill you, makes you stronger". If one keeps that in the back of their minds when going through tough times, it may give them the strength to persevere and be a stronger person in the future.

Indeed, many of the greatest persons we know went through tough times during their lifetimes. I also believe it's very difficult to fully appreciate and experience life without having experienced hardship. Is it inherently meaningful? I don't think so. But it can bear a lot of meaning and life lessons and in my view it is certainly not an inherently negative force.

I have been lost between too many camps of epistemology to be sure what "inherently meaningful" means for me or others. So I think about it in terms of exchange. Is suffering a valid component in any kind of exchange?

When I put it that way, I can strike a lot things off the list without hesitation:
I cannot build up a reserve of the stuff to pay for better lodgings in another plane of existence.
It is not valid currency that can be given in lieu of something else that is needed or desired by others, like affection or patience. Now, being patient can cause suffering but that is not what is given.
People do suffer things so that somebody else won't but that needs to separated from Item #1. Martyrdom requires a certain currency.

Suffering is a part of learning any art or trade. I have seen "geniuses" who somehow learned with greater ease than others but they too had their own baggage. In terms of currency, this does not have a one to one correspondence to receiving any particular benefit. I am an accomplished builder with many years of experience, it amazes me how stupid I can still be. There is a terrible expression some of us in the trade use when suffering does not confer much knowledge to a colleague: Rookie for Life.

Quoting Tzeentch

Suffering isn't meaningful unless one seeks the meaning of it. But is it worthwhile to look for meaning in suffering? My answer to that question is yes.

So, suffering can be inherently meaningful if one professes a non-solipsistic view on life. Does a solipsist suffer?

Quoting Valentinus

There is a terrible expression some of us in the trade use when suffering does not confer much knowledge to a colleague: Rookie for Life.

I'm a rookie for life, haha.

But, is suffering inherently meaningful? I think so.

Metaphorically it's a ladder everyone has to climb on.

Quoting Terrapin Station

Say I have a desire to be able to be invisible at will. Well, that desire isn't going to be met, but in my view it's ridiculous to say that I'm suffering because that desire isn't met.

Analogically, people want things that are beyond the scope of their control.

Hence Stoicism>?

Reply to Posty McPostface
Quoting Posty McPostface

But, is suffering inherently meaningful? I think so.

Metaphorically it's a ladder everyone has to climb on.

I am trying to say it's value depends on situations and points of view. There is a way I can understand it as a ladder. But I have seen it as a kind of prison too.

Quoting Valentinus

I am trying to say it's value depends on situations and points of view. There is a way I can understand it as a ladder. But I have seen it as a kind of prison too.

Oh, understood. I just see suffering as a noble feeling that everyone deals with and is a catalyst for further spiritual growth.

Some believe, as I do, that the one consciousness that is called God/Allah/Brahman etc is the only thing that is ultimately real, it is pure love but in order to know what it feels like to be that loving consciousness it has to experience the opposite to get some 'contrast'. But because that opposite doesn't exist it has to imagine it does, so it pretends to be everyone, forgetting what it really is for a while to make the 'dream' seem real. By experiencing the bitter and the sweet it doesn't harm anyone else because there isn't anyone else, it's only doing things to itself, 'you' 'me', the one consciousness sufferering in a dream and eventually waking up.

This might help some to understand the possible meaning and reason for suffering.

Only my belief of course.

Quoting Posty McPostface

But, is suffering inherently meaningful? I think so.

If meaning is a story we attach to certain events and situations then it would appear that suffering, or anything else, is not inherently meaningful.

Perhaps you have some other understanding of meaning?

Reply to TWI

Fascinating. Thanks.

Reply to Jake

I thought you had the correct reasoning but wrong conclusion here.

Reply to Posty McPostface
Isn't Jake asking you a question?
If you are putting on shoes, it is time for the other foot.

Quoting Posty McPostface

I thought you had the correct reasoning but wrong conclusion here.

Ok. Why?

Reply to Valentinus

I answered with a positive in terms of his premises but not conclusion. In other words what is there beyond certain events and situations. In my opinions they are what make life intelligible.

Reply to Jake

See my reply to Valentinus.

It looks like there is some disagreement about what is "inherent."
Maybe I am slow and I am certainly new here but I am not getting a self-evident experience here.
Help an old guy cross the street.

Reply to Valentinus

I mean to say that if all what is intelligible in life which are certain events and situations, then suffering, which stands out from such events and situations therefore makes life more meaningful. How can one know joy without sadness?

Reply to Posty McPostface
You are always at odds with something.
First, you are born in the first place. You must contend with the basic animal imperative- survive or die. This takes a tremendous amount of energy in terms of enculturation, learning, and cultivating ability to maneuver the socio-economic sphere.

Then, you must contend with the broader social and power structures of your society. You must contend with those who control various means of resources- employers, governments, tribal leaders and traditions, or what have you.

What to do about it? There is nothing you can do regarding the first problem. Antinatalism and suicide both represent pseudo-solutions. One only prevents future suffering- an ethical principle but not a solution to your own problem. The other stops suffering, but also stops the realization of the end of suffering.

The second problem may be solved in several ways. Perhaps take ownership of the social or power structures. This is tremendously hard- whether in some political socialism or simply individual ownership of capital means of production. Either way, you are going to have a hard time attaining each- though some people manage to do the latter. The former has never really accomplished much in terms of any realization of a socialist utopia- just inefficiencies of large command economies. Smaller communes have only ever worked within the comfortable confines of a larger capitalist society that protects it.. but I digress.

To step back a bit. Go to an abandoned parking lot with one broken down car in it early in the morning. Then come back and look at that abandoned car in the evening. Nothing much has changed. That is more or less the world as it is. Our frantic wills, characterized by our survival needs/wants and inability to simply be, is what causes all the drama. That cannot be prevented though. Small insights like the parking lot example, or dreams of utopia may be the only thing you have.

Quoting schopenhauer1

To step back a bit. Go to an abandoned parking lot with one broken down car in it early in the morning. Then come back and look at that abandoned car in the evening. Nothing much has changed. That is more or less the world as it is. Our frantic wills, characterized by our survival needs/wants and inability to simply be, is what causes all the drama. That cannot be prevented though. Small insights like the parking lot example, may or dreams of utopia may be the only thing you have.

One always has a home, though, to park one's car. Isn't a "home" an important concept in our daily lives?

Reply to Posty McPostface
Maintaining a homeostasis is just what we tend to do. It isn't just home though. It is the cost of keeping the home, the time spent maintaining the home, and the boredom felt if one does not find an activity of some engagement- something to go out and do so you can go home and rest. Again, the frantic survival, comfort, and entertainment needs. We cannot just be.

Quoting schopenhauer1

Maintaining a homeostasis is just what we tend to do. It isn't just home though. It is the cost of keeping the home, the time spent maintaining the home, and the boredom felt if one does not find an activity of some engagement- something to go out and do so you can go home and rest. Again, the frantic survival, comfort, and entertainment needs. We cannot just be.

But, doesn't the joy of owning a home or apartment override such negativism's? To have a place you can call "home" is a magical experience.

Quoting Posty McPostface

But, doesn't the joy of owning a home or apartment override such negativism's? To have a place you can call "home" is a magical experience.

There's a lot of stuff to maintain that magic. I am guessing you don't rent or own your own place?

Quoting schopenhauer1

There's a lot of stuff to maintain that magic. I am guessing you don't rent or own your own place?

No, does that deny my logic?

I agree with your last sentence. I have trouble with the first one.

There are a number of ways to approach this. I propose two of them as possible reasons to frame the topic in other ways than you have rather than as a rebuttal to what you have proposed.

All the reasons we hurt each other are not necessary to understand that suffering is part of being better or learning stuff. Unnecessary suffering is cruelty that serves cruel people. It is what has been going on for a long time. I accept that making universal claims on no other basis are problematic but I don't recognize a world where this element does not shape what I see.

Many people (probably myself in ways I don't understand) repeat the beat downs given by others. I see this clearly as something that is happening. Things get darker when I try to explain it. I don't have to explain everything. I am involved when I look away from something.

As a matter of full disclosure, I practice a kind of faith. An important part of the "Lord's prayer" is where it prays one does not get tested too much.

Anyway, there you have it.

Quoting Posty McPostface

No, does that deny my logic?

I don't see much of an argument. What I am trying to say is that having a home doesn't magically make suffering go away and is not usually an end in itself. It may be a goal if you are homeless or you are not independent and you want to be. That isn't a panacea though- just part of living in a certain stage of life. That life still requires the three things I mentioned. I'm not sure why you would try to reduce things this particular goal. You seem to be conflating some personal desire you have to own a home to solving your existential question about suffering. It doesn't compute. Work towards having your own home if that's what you want, but that in itself is not an argument for happiness unless you are combining it with some other idea of growth, or a hierarchy of needs, or being independent, etc. Having one's own home itself does not mean one is happy.

Reply to schopenhauer1

I'm only generalizing for things which we want or need. People want various things for differing reasons. That I can be happy over owning a home or apartment is one thing. But, that doesn't apply to all people. Some people want different things. The inherent lack in life is (momentarily) satisfied by certain actions. Then we go back to needing things or boredom.

Quoting Posty McPostface

The inherent lack in life is (momentarily) satisfied by certain actions. Then we go back to needing things or boredom.

This I agree with.

Reply to Valentinus

I'm not sure what post you are addressing Valentinus?

Quoting schopenhauer1

This I agree with.

But, still, sometimes we are satisfied for longer periods of time or non-temporally. Such as reading a good poem and remembering it due to its significance. Or owning a place one can call "home".

Reply to Posty McPostface Quoting Posty McPostface

I mean to say that if all what is intelligible in life which are certain events and situations, then suffering, which stands out from such events and situations therefore makes life more meaningful. How can one know joy without sadness?

Quoting Valentinus

As a matter of full disclosure, I practice a kind of faith. An important part of the "Lord's prayer" is where it prays one does not get tested too much.

Job was tested; but, was vindicated in the end. And what is unnecessary suffering? This is new to me.

Quoting Posty McPostface

But, still, sometimes we are satisfied for longer periods of time or non-temporally. Such as reading a good poem and remembering it due to its significance. Or owning a place one can call "home".

If you are fulfilled with romantic notions of home and poems, great. Still has to be maintained, paid for, worked, and the person dwelling there entertained. However, I think we both agree that perhaps imagination has something to do with getting by. The freedom of the mind to find significance and insights.

Quoting schopenhauer1

If you are fulfilled with romantic notions of home and poems, great. Still has to be maintained, paid for, worked, and entertained. However, I think we both agree that perhaps imagination has something to do with getting by. The freedom of the mind to find significance and insights.

I take the Kantian or Platonic notion of noesis with "imagination" here interchangeable. Schopenhauer based his philosophy as a form of idealism with noesis.

Quoting schopenhauer1

If you are fulfilled with romantic notions of home and poems, great.

What's wrong with denying people happiness with such notions? People live in the realm of the ideal for the most part of their lives.

Hundreds (thousands, millions, if you are counting) of years of slavery. How much was enough? Toward what purpose?
Stupid stuff we tell our kids. I try to not do that and I often fail. What is that about?
We live in a place we are sort of prepared for but little of that preparation gives a crap about what is happening to us or people we know.
Our life here is not just about whatever concerns us when we are challenged as individuals. It is also this mess that we have inherited. And we give to our successors.
I humbly propose that some things require further investigation.

Reply to Valentinus

Yes, I agree.

I want to ask how do you understand word suffering? What do you mean? Does suffer emotionally or physically or material? I think that people must experience difficult because without it life and truth will be very boring and monotone. Who would we'll becose if "suffering" disappeared? Friedrich Nietzsche said: "That which doesn't kill you makes you stronger"

Quoting Posty McPostface

Does a solipsist suffer?

I'd say so. It's the circumstances of the being that may cause one to suffer, but suffering is a mental or psychological interpretation of such circumstances.

Reply to Tzeentch
lets be honest life can be stupid at point but suffering plays a major role It was conficious that said
suffering is part of the world because its true Living in its basic form is just suffering Since technology has risen it has an impact that is no different than anything else

Reply to Posty McPostface
falling into aesthetic philosophy any good philosophers

"The answer to the problem of suffering is not away from the problem but in it. The inevitability of pain will not be met by deadening sensitivity but by increasing it, by exploring and feeling out the manner in which the natural organism itself wants to react and which its innate wisdom has provided".

Alan W. Watts.

Quoting Posty McPostface

The inherent lack in life is (momentarily) satisfied by certain actions. Then we go back to needing things or boredom.

This is a common pattern for sure, but it's not a fixed universal truth, as so many posts on the forum seem to imply. If this is what Schopensour is saying (I don't claim to know) he is wrong, misinformed, incomplete in his understanding.

The cycle being discussed is a fixed permanent condition only if we refuse to examine that which is generating the experience of lacking, a refusal which is admittedly very common.

Please stop chanting Schopensour and do your own investigation. Yes, there's a void underneath all the busyness and goals etc. Why? What's causing it? What is it's source?

Reply to WhiteNightScales You wrote:"...suffering plays a major role..."
I aren't such but I think that rich people don't especially suffering and they have good life. My point of view - suffering in full measure - fate middle class and sufferin don't plays such a major role in the life everyone.

Reply to TWI Whoa, good quote from Watts!

Quoting Posty McPostface

Is there any inherent meaning in suffering?

There's a degree of rationale which gives a person the capacity to extract value from every experience. However, the mitigating factor can be expressed in the sentiment, "if we value pain and suffering by the good it provides, then we may never want it to cease. For how can we choose to deprive ourselves of anything beneficial."
Perhaps, finding other ways to cultivate the same benefits is a better path;
or perhaps, a shift in attitude would serve just as well, for example, suppose instead of referring to it as pain and/or suffering, we chose to call it a condition of extreme focus of attention in our awareness. Maybe it's a response to the latter that we determine the appropriate course of actions which enable us to avoid future pain and suffering.

Quoting Posty McPostface

I say this because life is inherently filled with suffering.

I don't believe in this. I think our perspective is clouded by pain and suffering. Maybe out of fear, maybe out of weakness or maybe it's just plain ignorance.
There was a time we wanted to keep the stat quo on the idea that the earth was flat, some people still do. Currently, we're overcoming the point of view that women are inferior to men and that there are races of people superior to others. Pain and suffering may seem inherent in life until you meet that buddhist monk who asks, "what do hardships have to do with pain and suffering?" People who climb everest, if they're well prepared, endure the hardships but do not succumb to pain and suffering.
I think pain and suffering are indications of particular conditions (hardships, maybe?) which demand our attention and how we respond determines the nature of our future interactions in those conditions.

Quoting Posty McPostface

And, even then am I morally obligated to relieve others of their suffering had I known how unpleasant the feeling is?

Would you want it done for you? Then, I think you know what you ought to do.

Suffering is a point for perspective!
How you think about suffering defines where that point is.
Your thoughts shift the tolerance point back and forth, fundamentally you decide if indeed you are suffering.
Comparisons to others is irrelevant.

There are only two ways to answer the question. Either ask God, or ask the patients in a palliative care ward.