You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Moderation Poll Standard

S October 15, 2017 at 19:56 6825 views 20 comments
In response to recent criticism - whether real or entirely imagined - concerning the previous poll about standards of moderation, this moderate poll has been designed to set the standard for how a poll on moderation ought to look. So, have your say!

HANOVER IS GOAT.

Comments (20)

unenlightened October 15, 2017 at 20:21 #115309
Well there's a shocker. As of this moment:

Quoting Sapientia
About right
  0%


Some work needed therefore.
S October 15, 2017 at 20:23 #115311
Quoting unenlightened
Some work needed therefore.


You're right. That'll have to be fixed, like all good polls.
Hachem October 15, 2017 at 20:24 #115312
I feel I need to justify my vote. My choice has nothing to do with the order as it was presented in the previous Poll.
I have carefully weighted each alternative and chosen the one that comes closest to my own convictions.
Srap Tasmaner October 15, 2017 at 20:29 #115316
Reply to Sapientia
You should conduct multiple polls with the answers arranged differently so as not to influence how people vote.
Baden October 16, 2017 at 06:58 #115494
Reply to Sapientia

Fair enough, although to achieve balance and give members a chance to complain a bit more, I propose a new poll, the Poll of Standard Moderation Standards Poll as follows:

The moderation on this site is:

1) Preposterous
2) Preposterous
3) Preposterous

Maybe this one needs to go in the Philosophy of Science category. :B
Cuthbert October 16, 2017 at 11:12 #115560
I hestitated whether to click "About right". I think that "About right" is about right. I'm surprised that we weren't offered the option "About right" because I would have chosen that one for preference.
Baden October 16, 2017 at 11:17 #115564
Nobody clicked the third option, which is telling.
Cuthbert October 16, 2017 at 11:19 #115565
I was tempted, but I didn't want to provoke or discourage what is an excellent forum.
TimeLine October 16, 2017 at 11:20 #115567
Reply to Baden The things I do for you.
Baden October 16, 2017 at 11:20 #115568
Reply to TimeLine

Now you've ruined it. :(
TimeLine October 16, 2017 at 11:22 #115569
Reply to Baden Oh, what? And here I was thinking I... anyway, I'm too sleepy to figure out humorous response.
Baden October 16, 2017 at 11:23 #115571
Reply to TimeLine

I forgive you. Let's be friends again and set an example for everyone.
TimeLine October 16, 2017 at 11:24 #115572
Reply to Baden How about

User image
Baden October 16, 2017 at 11:26 #115574
Reply to TimeLine

Okay then... :’(
praxis October 16, 2017 at 16:28 #115614
The moderation on this site is:
  • About right (for moderators)
  • About right (for members)
  • About right (for banned members)

Hanover October 16, 2017 at 17:17 #115625
As a moderator, I noted something missing in the poll, so I made a minor change.
Agustino October 16, 2017 at 17:32 #115626
Reply to Hanover
I suggest that I am given moderator position for 10mins to make a necessary amendment to the amended poll.

It would read as follows:

"HANOVER [s]IS[/s] WAS GREAT. LET'S MAKE HANOVER GREAT AGAIN!"
S October 17, 2017 at 06:49 #115825
User image
Baden October 17, 2017 at 07:15 #115829
Red is catching up. There is still hope.
Baden October 17, 2017 at 07:16 #115832
Reply to Sapientia

Is that one of the ones where if you stare at it for more than ten seconds, you go insane?