A question about truth - Help
I'm reading some analytic philosophy, and the author writes: "truth is primarily a property of judgement not of propositions" - Is this true?
(I'm new to these forums. And I'm excited to join in the fray. But I'm not sure if I am free to ask questions to others, or if this is considered inappropriate. The reason is that I work in marketing/sales and study philosophy on the side, so I have no intellectual superiors to turn to! Any help would be greatly appreciated, and I hope I can answer other people's questions as well)
(I'm new to these forums. And I'm excited to join in the fray. But I'm not sure if I am free to ask questions to others, or if this is considered inappropriate. The reason is that I work in marketing/sales and study philosophy on the side, so I have no intellectual superiors to turn to! Any help would be greatly appreciated, and I hope I can answer other people's questions as well)
Comments (9)
In other words, it is not something concrete and external like rain. It is a concept that depends on cultural context for meaning and application.
At least that is the way that I see it.
"Either A or B is true." Why would we say that A and B are necessarily judgments? Does the author say?
The way this is written make it sound like truth is not a property of a proposition, which would be false. Why'd you pick this quote in particular? Do you disagree with it or..?
I can make sense of that. Any train of thought must have some axioms to start from and their truth is a matter of judgment. Without axioms thinking would be impossible: Munchhausen Trilemma
However, what follows from axioms are truths that are evidential and so not just a matter of judgment.