You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Quantity and quality

Axel Burenius July 14, 2017 at 20:20 2450 views 6 comments
Question: what is the 'transition from quantity to quality'? I come across it in various philosophical texts and also poetry and think it has something to do with Marx... WHAT DOES IT MEAN?

Comments (6)

Deleted User July 14, 2017 at 20:30 #86700
This user has been deleted and all their posts removed.
Axel Burenius July 14, 2017 at 20:34 #86702
284. Look at a stone and imagine it having sensations.—One says to oneself: How could one so much as get the idea of ascribing a sensation to a thing? One might as well ascribe it to a number!—And now look at a wriggling fly and at once these difficulties vanish and pain seems able to get a foothold here, where before everything was, so to speak, too smooth for it. And so, too, a corpse seems to us quite inaccessible to pain.—Our attitude to what is alive and to what is dead, is not the same. All our reactions are different.—If anyone says: "That cannot simply come from the fact that a living thing moves about in such-and-such a way and a dead one not", then I want to intimate to him that this is a case of the transition 'from quantity to quality'. (From Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations)
Axel Burenius July 14, 2017 at 20:36 #86705
But I've seen it in other texts, too. It's a notion, a quote, I just don't know where from and what it means...
Deleted User July 14, 2017 at 21:10 #86716
This user has been deleted and all their posts removed.
Cavacava July 14, 2017 at 22:10 #86742
Trotsky and the molecular structure of the revolution...“tobogganing towards catastrophe,”

All social changes, minute at first , accumulates unseen and unknown by most continuing to form until the quantity of this unrest reaches critical level, the tipping point, and they become a new quality, a new structure a social explosion of a revolutionary quality.

Kaboom!
Axel Burenius July 15, 2017 at 11:02 #86923
Right, thank you both for your answers! I think Cavacava nailed it. The quotation is what that made me wonder, who/what W is citing and how the notion was originally used.