A True Contradiction
Argument A
1. Snow is white
2. White is not emotion [white is a color, emotion is not]
Ergo,
3. Snow is not emotion [from 1, 2]
---
Argument B
4. C is a black circle
5. C is black & C is circular [from 4]
From 6 - 8 refer to argument A
[i]6. C is black [5 Simp]
7. Black is not circular [black is a color, circular is not]
Ergo,
8. C is not circular[/i]
9. C is circular [5 Simp]
10. C is circular & C is not circular [8, 9 Conj] [Contradiction!]
There are black circles :point: O and ?. So 4. C is a black circle cannot be false.
Conclusion: There are true contradictions (see 10)
1. Snow is white
2. White is not emotion [white is a color, emotion is not]
Ergo,
3. Snow is not emotion [from 1, 2]
---
Argument B
4. C is a black circle
5. C is black & C is circular [from 4]
From 6 - 8 refer to argument A
[i]6. C is black [5 Simp]
7. Black is not circular [black is a color, circular is not]
Ergo,
8. C is not circular[/i]
9. C is circular [5 Simp]
10. C is circular & C is not circular [8, 9 Conj] [Contradiction!]
There are black circles :point: O and ?. So 4. C is a black circle cannot be false.
Conclusion: There are true contradictions (see 10)
Comments (4)
I thought so too. Thanks for noticing my error.
individual -> particular
particular -> universal
individual -> universal
You have replaced the universal in the second step with a second particular.