Need help on how to derive this proof

First :This is not home work
I use the Logic Book.
This problem has to be done in SD+
I tried everything and gotten nowhere

I request hints with the rules and how to solve it

Derive I=>~D
1.(F &G) v (H &~I) Assume
2. I=>~(F & D) ?
3.| F&D =>~l. ?
4.~I=>(F=>D) 3 exp ?