Harry KaethlerJanuary 19, 2021 at 21:281200 views3 comments
This is my observation and I would like it be considered in the broadest sense to all physical and non-physical, animate and non-animate
Comments (3)
unenlightenedJanuary 19, 2021 at 22:31#4907080 likes
I think I would generally prefer to call it "interaction".
Thus your observation is a particular sort of interaction (with the world), and your posting about it is another kind of interaction, and our interaction of call and response is what i would properly like to call an attempt at 'communication'. The 'com' root in communication means 'with' - I think 'being with another being'.
Plants communicate with each other. In a lesser way, don't magnets do as well? Being being subjective of course, sure.
Gus LamarchJanuary 19, 2021 at 23:30#4907240 likes
What you call here as "communication" is nothing more than the simple mechanics developed by us, to project the characteristics of our own ego - sensations, feelings, wills, desires, fears, peculiarities, tastes, etc ... -. And we are great at creating the transvestment of this characteristics before expressing them.
Comments (3)
Thus your observation is a particular sort of interaction (with the world), and your posting about it is another kind of interaction, and our interaction of call and response is what i would properly like to call an attempt at 'communication'. The 'com' root in communication means 'with' - I think 'being with another being'.
Quoting Harry Kaethler
Your own "communication" proves me right.